摘要
"炸金花"案的出现将作为行政机关内部执法规则的行政裁量权基准再次推向了社会公众的视野。行政裁量权基准有效实施的前提是制定得较完备的裁量权基准,实施前的备案审查应当区分指导性规范和裁量性规范的不同。在行政裁量权基准的实施中,现代行政程序法所确立的信息公开、说明理由、评估等一系列制度仍然存在着发挥作用的空间。行政裁量权基准实施后的责任机制关乎行政裁量权基准对内和对外拘束力的实现,行政执法责任制的落实有助于推动行政裁量权基准的外部化,从而为行政诉讼中人民法院一并审查行政裁量权基准奠定基础。
The happening of the case of "Zha Jin Hua" makes the administrative discretion standard as the internal law enforcement rules of administrative organs fall into public view. The premise of the effective implementation of the administrative discretion standard is to establish a relatively complete discretion benchmark, and to distinguish between the guiding norms and the discretion of the different standards in implementation of the record review. In the implementation of the administrative discretion standard, the moderu administrative procedure law establishes a series of system, such as the information disclosure, the explanation of reason, the appraisal and so on. There is still room for these systems to play a better role. The responsibility mechanism of the administrative discretion standard is related to the implementation of the administrative discretion standard, the implementation of the responsibility system of administrative law enforcement is helpful to promote the standardization of administrative discretion, so as to provide a basis for the people's court to review the basis of administrative discretion in judicial review.
出处
《法学论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第6期22-30,共9页
Legal Forum
关键词
行政裁量权基准
备案审查
程序制度
执法责任
司法监督
administrative discretion standard
record review
administrative procedure
responsibility system of administrative law enforcement
Judicial Review