期刊文献+

论商标侵权判定的混淆标准——对我国《商标法》第57条第2项的解释 被引量:31

On the Confusion Standards of Trademark Infringement:The Explanation to the Article 57(2) of Trademark Law in Our Country
原文传递
导出
摘要 我国《商标法》第57条第2项引入了混淆可能性要件,将商标侵权判定标准改变为相似性和混淆可能性。在商标侵权判定中引入混淆可能性要件,符合商标法的原理,是我国商标立法的重大进步。在混淆可能性和相似性的关系方面,二者都是商标侵权判定的独立要件。相似性为前置性要件,混淆可能性为结果性要件,混淆可能性可从主体、程度、类型这三个方面来解释和判断。商标的近似性、商品的类似性应是物理意义上的相似性,而非混淆可能性语境上的相似性。在商标侵权判定中,相似性的证明标准不应过高。 The trademark law in our country introduced the likelihood of confusion elements in article 57(2) and changed the trademark infringement standards into similarity and the likelihood of confusion.Introducing the likelihood of confusion elements in trademark infringement determination to comply with the trademark law principle is a major progress of the trademark legislation in our country.In the relations of the likelihood of confusion and similarity,the likelihood of confusion and similarity are independent elements in trademark infringement determination in article 57(2).Similarity is the front elements and the likelihood of confusion is the outcome elements.In the meaning and application aspects of the likelihood of confusion and similarity,the likelihood of confusion can explain and judge from three aspects of subject,degree and types.The trademark of similarity and the goods of similarity should be in the physical sense,and should not be the similarity on the likelihood of confusion context.Meanwhile,in the trademark infringement determination,the proof standards of similarity should not be set up too strict.
作者 姚鹤徽
出处 《法学家》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第6期51-63,174-175,共13页 The Jurist
基金 湖南省重点学科建设项目(湘教发[2011]76号) 2015年湖南师范大学青年优秀人才培养计划资助
关键词 商标侵权判定 混淆可能性 相似性 Trademark Infringement Standards Likelihood of Confusion Similarity
  • 引文网络
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1J. Thomas McCarthy, McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition, Eagan: Thomson/West, 2006.
  • 2Richard L. Kirkatrick, Likelihood of Confusion in Trademark Law, New York: Practising Law Institute, 2010.
  • 3张今.商标法第三次修改的几个重大问题解读[J].中华商标,2013(11):14-18. 被引量:15
  • 4邓宏光.论商标侵权的判断标准--兼论《中华人民共和国商标法》第52条的修改[J].法商研究,2010,27(1):46-53. 被引量:45
  • 5See Richard L. Kirkatrick, Likelihood of Confusion in Trademark Law, New York: Practising Law Institute, 2010, ~ 1: 1.
  • 6See J. Thomas McCarthy, McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition, Eagan: Thomson/West, 2006, ~ 23: 1.
  • 7[日]森智香子、广濑文彦、森康晃:《日本商标法实务》,北京林达刘知识产权代理事务所译,知识产权出版社2012年版,第106页.
  • 8我国台湾地区“混淆误认之虞”审查基准第2条,载法律咨询网http://www.110.com/fagui/law_12416.html.
  • 9Shashank Upadhye, "Trademark Surveys: Identifying the Relevant Universe of Confused Consumers. Fordham Intellectual Property", 8 Media & Entertainment Law Journal (1998), p. 580.
  • 10王敏铨:《美国商标法之混淆之虞及其特殊样态之研究》,《智慧财产权月刊》2006年第94期,第87页.

二级参考文献44

共引文献56

同被引文献310

引证文献31

二级引证文献71

相关主题

;
使用帮助 返回顶部