摘要
社会治理体系现代化最直观的标志即多元主体的协同共治。学界对协同治理的发生机制与可持续性问题也有着越来越多的讨论。丰富的乡村社会治理实践既为协同治理如何发生、如何维系的讨论提供了现实土壤,又为治理现代化的发展奠定了基础。文章选取河南省信阳市郝堂村作为研究对象,通过对郝堂试验的基本内容与实施效果的分析,发现其选择以"金融合作"作为协同治理的起点与原点,有效调动了地方政府、基层组织、民间组织和乡村精英的积极性,积聚了乡村社会资本,改善了乡村经济状况,并以此为基础在"生态共治"的层面上打造协同实践的增长点,提升治理的可持续性。通过对郝堂试验基础性条件的分析,可以发现其在行动者的协同维度上较为全面地体现了府际合作、部际合作与公私合作的治理理念,集中表现在政策协同、项目协同与服务协同三个方面。结合郝堂试验合作行为的触发机制与维系机制的分析,发现其在可持续性层面上存在着启动条件的前置性、金融合作的风险性、风险控制的外置性与合作模式的草根性等问题。因而,郝堂试验在寻找协同治理原点与增长点、培育乡村社会的主体观念、提升治理体系风险意识等方面的治理理念,均值得其他地方参考借鉴;即便如此,因应基础条件的差异性以及郝堂试验的潜在风险性,各地也不应简单地复制郝堂做法,而应该在汲取郝堂经验的基础上找到适宜各地协同实践的原点与增长点。
Collaborative governance with multi-subjects should be the most intuitive sign of the modernization of social governance system.The academic circles have the discussion on the mechanism and sustainability of collaborative governance increasingly.The rich rural community governance practices provide not only the realistic soil for how to provide and maintain the collaboration of cooperative governance,but also the foundation of the development of modern governance.This article selected Haotang Village of Xinyang city in Henan Province as the research subject.By analyzing the basic content and the effect of the implementation of the experiment of Haotang,it is found that as it took"financial cooperation"as the starting point and origin of collaborative governance,it effectively mobilized the enthusiasm of local government,grassroot organizations,non-governmental organizations and rural elites,accumulated the rural social capital,and improved the rural economic situation,It also improved the sustainability of governance by the growth point in "ecological governance".By analyzing the basic conditions of the experiment,it is found that it has comprehensively reflected the concept of governance with the intergovernmental cooperation,inter-section cooperation and public-private cooperation in the perspective of the coordination of actors.It focuses on three aspects:policy collaboration,project collaboration and service collaboration.Based on the analysis of the mechanism of the trigger and maintenance of the cooperative behavior in the experiment,it is found that it has the problems of the pre-condition,the risk of financial cooperation,the external nature of risk control and the nature of the grassroots of collaborative mode in sustainability.Therefore,its ideas of finding the origin and growth point of collaborative governance,cultivating rural society and enhancing the risk awareness of governance system are worthy of other place's reference.Even though,because of the differences in the basic conditions and the potential risk of the experiment,it should not simply follow the practice of experiment,but find out the origin and growth point of the collaborative practice based on the experience at stake.
出处
《北京师范大学学报(社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第6期13-22,共10页
Journal of Beijing Normal University(Social Sciences)
基金
国家社会科学基金项目"药品安全协同治理的运行机制与实践路径研究"(15CZZ017)
中央高校基本科研业务费"北京城市环境协同治理的运行机制与影响因素研究"(3262015T18)
中国行政体制改革研究会基金课题"社会治理能力现代化研究"
关键词
社会治理现代化
协同治理
郝堂试验
合作
可持续性
modernization of social governance
collaborative governance
experiment of Haotang
collaboration
sustainability