期刊文献+

外固定支架与内固定治疗桡骨远端骨折的临床疗效比较 被引量:9

Observation on the Clinical Effect of External Fixation and Internal Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较外固定支架与内固定治疗桡骨远端骨折的临床效果。方法选择2012年8月至2014年3月于武汉科技大学附属汉阳医院就诊的临床诊断为桡骨远端骨折的患者86例,采用随机数字表法分为外固定支架治疗组和内固定治疗组,各43例。外固定支架治疗组采用外固定支架进行治疗,内固定治疗组采用内固定进行治疗,对两种手术方式临床愈合时间及临床疗效进行比较,所有患者术后3个月进行随访,比较两组患者腕关节活动度情况。结果内固定治疗组腕关节背伸、旋后、桡偏及尺偏的角度均大于外固定支架治疗组[(41.2±3.9)°比(39.1±3.6)°,(72.5±3.5)°比(69.4±3.1)°,(14.6±2.3)°比(13.4±2.0)°,(26.4±3.1)°比(24.8±3.5)°],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05或P<0.01);内固定组的优良率为83.7%(36/43),高于外固定支架治疗组的55.8%(24/43),两组临床疗效比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论内固定治疗桡骨远端骨折的临床疗效优于外固定支架治疗的效果,腕关节旋后及桡偏的程度大于外固定,且两组的骨折中愈合时间接近。 Objective To compare the clinical effect of external fixation and internal fixation in treat- ment of distal radius fractures. Methods Total of 86 patients diagnosed with distal radius fractures in Han- yang Hospital Affiliated to Wuhan University of Science and Technology from Aug. 2012 to Mar. 2014, and they were divided into external fixation treatment group and internal fixation treatment group according to random number table method, 43 cases each. The external fixation treatment group received external fixation treatment, and the internal fixation treatment group received internal fixation treatment. The clinical healing time and clinical effect were compared ,and and 3 months follow-up was done to compared the wrist movement of the two groups. Results The wrist dorsiflexion, supination angle and ulnar deviation, radial deviation in the internal fixation treatment group were greater than the external fixation treatment group [ (41.2±3.9 )% vs (39.1±3.6)%,(72.5±3.5)% vs (69.4±3.1)%,(14.6±2.3)% vs (13.4±2.0)%,(26.4±3.1% vs (24. 8±3.5 )%] , with statistically significant differences between the two groups ( P 〈 0. 05 or P 〈 0.01 ) ; the excellent rate in the external fixation group was 55.8% ( 24/43 ), in the internal fixation group was 83.7 % (36/43), the difference was statistically significant ( P 〈 0. 01 ). Conclusion The clinical effect of internal fixation for the treatment of the distal radical fracture is better than external fixation ,wrist supination and radial deviation is greater than external fixation, and the median fracture healing time of the two groups is similar.
作者 周群广
出处 《医学综述》 2016年第2期408-410,共3页 Medical Recapitulate
关键词 桡骨远端骨折 外固定 内固定 Distal radical fracture External fixation Internal fixation
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Ge YH,Wang ZG,Cai HQ,et al.Flexible intramedullary nailing had better outcomes than kirschner wire fixation in children with distal humeral metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction fracture:a retrospective observational analysis[J].Int J Clin Exp Med,2014,7(10):3568-3572.
  • 2Iselin LD,Mett T,Babst R,et al.The triceps reflecting approach(Bryan-Morrey)for distal humerus fracture osteosynthesis[J].BMC Musculoskelet Disord,2014,15(1):406.
  • 3Kim JK,Kim DJ.The risk factors associated with subluxation of the distal interphalangeal joint in mallet fracture[J].J Hand Surg Eur Vol,2015,40(1):63-67.
  • 4Roh YH,Lee BK,Noh JH,et al.Factors associated with complex regional pain syndrome type I in patients with surgically treated distal radius fracture[J].Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2014,134(12):1775-1781.
  • 5Malay S,Chung KC.Testing the validity of preventing complex regional pain syndrome with vitamin C after distal radius fracture[J].J Hand Surg Am,2014,39(11):2251-2257.
  • 6Kim JK,Park JS,Shin SJ,et al.The effect of brachioradialis release during distal radius fracture fixation on elbow flexion strength and wrist function[J].J Hand Surg Am,2014,39(11):2246-2250.
  • 7马立峰,于浩淼,杨稳,郭艾.桡骨远端骨折对腕关节功能影响的研究进展[J].医学综述,2011,17(4):559-561. 被引量:40
  • 8张春,刘世清,陈子健,廖琦.切开复位T形钢板固定术治疗桡骨远端骨折的荟萃分析[J].医学综述,2012,18(22):3852-3855. 被引量:6
  • 9吴立志,洪华兴,顾仕林,易利奇,蔡庆康.外固定支架与钢板内固定治疗成人桡骨远端不稳定型骨折的临床研究[J].中国现代医生,2013,51(34):43-46. 被引量:13
  • 10王卫东.不同固定方式治疗桡骨远端不稳定骨折的临床对照研究[J].当代医学,2013,19(13):101-103. 被引量:16

二级参考文献93

共引文献107

同被引文献51

引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部