期刊文献+

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗围术期应用比伐芦定多中心、大样本回顾性研究 被引量:30

A large-scale, multicenter, retrospective study on efficacy of bivalirudin use during peri-percutaneous coronary intervention period for Chinese patients with coronary heart disease
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 观察比伐芦定在中国冠心病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)中应用的有效性和安全性.方法 回顾性纳入2013年7月至2015年10月间在国内88家中心接受PCI且在PCI围术期应用比伐芦定的连续病例共3 271例.主要观察指标为术后30 d内的净不良临床事件(NACE,包括死亡、心肌梗死、卒中、紧急靶血管血运重建和全部出血),其他观察指标为30 d主要心脑血管不良事件(MACCE,包括死亡、心肌梗死、卒中和紧急靶血管血运重建)、全部出血以及支架内血栓.结果 入选患者平均年龄(65.12±12.44)岁,女性占27.4%(889/3 244).稳定性冠心病、非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征和ST抬高型急性心肌梗死分别占5.0%(162/3 248),44.6%(1 450/3 248)和50.4%(1 636/3 248).经桡动脉介入治疗比例89.5% (2 879/3 271),围术期接受替格瑞洛和替罗非班治疗的比例分别为9.7% (316/3 271)和34.1%(1 115/3 271).69.3%(2 266/3 271)的患者接受术后比伐芦定持续静滴,其中46.3%(1 050/2 266)接受高剂量维持静滴,中位数时间为2.5(1.0,4.0)h.30 d随访时,NACE、MACCE、死亡和出血事件的发生率分别为3.45%(103/2 988),2.17% (65/2 994),1.03% (31/3 017)和1.37% (41/2 996).共4例(0.13%)发生支架内血栓,其中有3例(0.09%)为急性支架内血栓.结论 在当前中国PCI围术期治疗实践中,比伐芦定可安全有效地应用于不同PCI适应证的冠心病患者,在发挥良好抗凝疗效的同时,可将出血风险控制在较低水平. Objective To observe the efficacy and safety of bivalirudin use in Chinese patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) during the peri-percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) period.Methods A total of 3 271 patients who underwent PCI and received periprocedural bivalirudin treatment between July 2013 and October 2015 from 88 centers of China were involved in this study.The primary outcome was 30-day net adverse clinical events (NACE a composite of major adverse cardiac or cerebral events (MACE,all-cause death,reinfarction,urgent target vessel revascularization,or stroke) or bleeding),the secondary outcome was stent thrombosis at 30 days.Results The mean age of enrolled patients was (65.12 ± 12.44) years old,27.4% (889/3 244) of them were female.Percent of stable coronary disease (SCD),non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) and ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) was 5.0% (162/3 248),44.6% (1 450/3 248) and 50.4% (1 636/3 248) respectively.Radial access was performed in 89.5% (2 879/3 271) patients,and 9.7% (316/3 271) and 34.1% (1 115/3 271) patients also received ticagrelor and tirofiban medication.69.3% (2 266/3 271) patients received post-procedural bivalirudin infusion,in which 46.3% (1 050/2 266) was treated at PCI-does,with a median duration of 2.5 (1.0,4.0) h.During the 30-day follow-up,NACE occurred in 3.45% (103/2 988) patients,the incidence of MACE,death was 2.17% (65/2 994) and 1.03% (31/3 017),respectively and bleeding events were recorded in 1.37% (41/2 996) patients.Four cases (0.13%) of stent thrombosis (3 acute stent thrombosis) were recorded.Conclusion Peri-PCI Bivalirudin use is safe and related with low bleeding risk in Chinese CHD patients.
出处 《中华心血管病杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第2期121-127,共7页 Chinese Journal of Cardiology
基金 基金项目:国家十二五科技支撑计划课题(2011BAI11B07) 国家科技重大专项课题(2012ZX09303016-002)
关键词 冠状动脉疾病 血管成形术 经腔 经皮冠状动脉 治疗结果 比伐芦定 Coronary heart disease Angioplasty,transluminal,percutaneous coronary Treatment outcome Bivalirudin
  • 引文网络
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Capodanno D, De Caterina R. Bivalirudin for acute coronary syndromes: premises, promises and doubts [ J ]. Thromb Hacmost, 2015, 113 (4) : 698-707. DOI: 10. 1160/TH14-09- 0765.
  • 2Stone GW, MeLaurin BT, Cox DA, et al. Bivalirudin for patients with acute coronary syndromes [ J]. N Engl J Med, 2006, 355 (21) : 2203-2216. DOI : 10. 1056/NEJMoa062437.
  • 3Kastrati A, Neumann FJ, Schulz S, et at. Abciximab and heparin versus bivalirudin for non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction [ J ]. N Engl J Med, 2011, 365 (21) : 1980-1989. DOI: 10. 1056/ NEJMoa1109596.
  • 4Stone GW, Witzenbichler B, Guagliumi G, et al. Bivalirudin during primary PCI in acute myocardial infarction [ J ]. N Engl J Med,2008,358 (21) :2218-2230. DOI : 10. 1056/NEJMoa0708191.
  • 5Steg PG, van't Hof A, Hamm CW, et al. Bivalirudin started during emergency transport for primary PCI[ J]. N Engl J Med, 2013, 369(23) : 2207-2217. DOI:10. 1056/NEJMoa1311096.
  • 6Han Y, Guo J, Zheng Y, et al. Bivalirudin vs heparin with or without tirofiban during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction: the BRIGHT randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA, 2015, 313 ( 13 ) : 1336-1346. DOI: 10. 1001/ jama. 2015. 2323.
  • 7Valgimigli M, Frigoti E, Leonardi S, et al. Bivalirudin or Unfractionated Heparin in Acute Coronary Syndromes[ J]. N Engl J Med, 2015, 373 ( 11 ): 997-1009. DOI: 10. 1056/ NEJMoa1507854.
  • 8O'Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2013, 61 (4) : e78-e140. DOI : 10. 1016/j. jacc. 2012.11. 019.
  • 9Steg PG, James SK, Atar D, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation [ J]. Eur Heart J, 2012, 33 (20) : 2569-2619. DOI:10. 1093/eurheartj/ehs215.
  • 10中国经皮冠状动脉介入治疗指南2012(简本)[J].中华心血管病杂志,2012,40(4):271-277. 被引量:426

二级参考文献10

  • 1Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery ( EACTS ), European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), Wijns W, et al. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J,2010 , 31:2501-2555.
  • 2Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/ SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines and the society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions. Circulation, 2011, 124 :e574-651.
  • 3Hillis LD, Smith PK, Anderson JL, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines, developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2011,58 :e123-210.
  • 4Nashef SA, Roques F, Michel P, et al. European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation ( EuroSCORE ). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 1999,16:9-13.
  • 5Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med, 2009,360:961- 972.
  • 6Peterson ED, Dai D, DeLong ER, et al. Contemporary mortality risk prediction for percutaneous coronary intervention: results from 588,398 procedures in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. J Am Coil Cardiol,2010,55:1923-1932.
  • 7Online STS fish calculator [ S/OL]. [ 2012-01-01 ]. http:// riskcalc, sts. org/STSWebRiskCalc273/de, aspx.
  • 8Mehta SR, Tanguay JF, Eikelboom JW, et al. Double-dose versus standard-dose clopidogrel and high-dose versus low-dose aspirin in individuals undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes ( CURRENT-OASIS 7 ): a randomised factorial trial. Lancet,2010,376 : 1233-1243.
  • 9Mehta SR, Granger CB, Eikelboom JW, et al. Efficacy and safety of fondaparinux versus enoxaparin in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the OASIS-5 trial. J Am Cell Cardiol,2007,50 : 1742-1751.
  • 10Mehran R, Rao SV, Bhatt DL, et al. Standardized bleeding definitions for cardiovascular clinical trials: a consensus report from the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium. Circulation, 2011,123:2736-2747.

共引文献425

同被引文献262

引证文献30

二级引证文献318

;
使用帮助 返回顶部