期刊文献+

支气管热成形术治疗重度支气管哮喘的有效性和安全性研究 被引量:36

Effectiveness and safety of bronchial thermoplasty in patients with severe asthma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨支气管热成形术治疗重度支气管哮喘(哮喘)的有效性和安全性.方法 2014年3-11月中日友好医院招募入组12例重度哮喘患者,自愿接受支气管热成形术治疗.检测支气管热成形术治疗前患者的气道炎症及生物标志物水平(血嗜酸粒细胞百分比、诱导痰嗜酸粒细胞百分比、血清IgE、呼出气一氧化氮水平),以评估气道炎症类型;收集12例患者治疗前1年内重度哮喘急性发作次数及因哮喘急性发作住院情况;观察治疗后3周内不良反应发生情况,评估治疗后1年内重度哮喘急性发作次数、重度哮喘急性发作率、因哮喘急性发作住院次数及住院率、口服激素剂量等变化.结果 12例患者术前及术后1年内重度哮喘急性发作患者分别为11和6例,重度哮喘急性发作累计次数分别为76和16次,因哮喘急性发作住院患者分别为10及3例,累计住院次数分别为56和6次,术后1年内重度哮喘急性发作率、因哮喘急性发作住院率、口服激素剂量均较术前1年明显下降[分别为(1.3±0.5)和(6.3±1.9)次183;例^-1·年^-1;(0.50±0.26)和(4.67±1.90)次·例^-1·年^-1;(8.5±4.6)和(22.0±2.6)mg/d,均P<0.05].术后重度哮喘急性发作率下降79.4%,因哮喘急性发作住院率下降89.4%.术后3周最常见不良事件为咳嗽(8例次)、咳痰量增加(20例次)、PEF短暂下降(7例次)、喘息(4例次),多数在术后1周内缓解.1例患者3次术后均出现肺炎,经抗感染治疗痊愈.术后3周内无严重不良事件发生,术后1年胸部CT未见气道结构性改变.结论 应用支气管热成形术治疗重度哮喘,可减少重度哮喘急性发作并降低急性发作住院率,无严重不良事件发生. Objective To assess the effectiveness and safety of bronchial thermoplasty (BT)in patients with severe asthma.Method The China-Japan Friendship Hospital recruited 12 patients with severe asthma who were voluntary to take BT treatment from March 2014 to November 2014.The levels of airway inflammation and biological markers (percentage of blood eosinophils,percentage of sputum eosinophils,serum IgE,fractional exhaled nitric oxide) of the patients were examined before the treatment in order to identify the types of airway inflammation.The numbers of severe exacerbations and related hospitalizations within 1 year before and after BT were obtained for each patient.The occurrence of adverse events within 3 weeks after the treatment was collected.And the patient status within 1 year after the BT treatment was compared with that before the treatment,in terms of the number of severe exacerbations,exacerbation rate,the number of related hospitalizations,hospitalization rate and oral corticosteroid dose.Results For before and 1 year after the treatment,the numbers of subjects suffering severe exacerbations were 11 and 6,the numbers of total severe exacerbation were 76 and 16,the numbers of patients hospitalized due to acute attacks were 10 and 3,and the numbers of total hospitalizations were 56 and 6,respectively.The severe exacerbation rate,hospitalization rate and oral corticosteroid dose were significantly reduced 1 year after the treatment [(1.3 ± 0.48 vs.6.3 ± 1.9) events/subject/year,(0.50 ± 0.26 vs.4.67 ± 1.90) events/subject/year,(8.5 ± 4.6 vs.22.0 ± 2.6) mg/d,P 〈 0.05].The most common adverse events within 3 weeks after BT treatment were cough (8 events),expectoration (20 events),temporary PEF reduction (7 events),wheezing (4 events),but most of these symptoms were relieved in 1 week.One subject suffered pneumonia after each of the 3 procedures but also recovered soon after an antibiotic therapy.No adverse events occurred because of BT treatment within 3 weeks after the treatment.Computed tomographic scans from baseline to 1 year after the BT treatment showed no structural abnormalities related to BT.Conclusions These data demonstrate the benefits of BT with regard to both asthma control (based on reduction in severe exacerbations and hospitalizations due to acute exacerbations) and safety.BT might offer a new approach to treating severe asthma.
出处 《中华结核和呼吸杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第3期177-182,共6页 Chinese Journal of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases
基金 北京市科委首都临床特色应用研究重点项目(2015-BKJ-001)
关键词 哮喘 治疗学 支气管热成形术 Asthma Therapeutics Bronchial thermoplasty
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1林江涛.努力提高我国难治性哮喘的防治和研究水平[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2010,33(8):561-562. 被引量:16
  • 2Danek CJ, Lombard CM, Dungworth DL, et al. Reduction in airway hyperresponsiveness to methacholine by the application of RF energy in dogs [ J ]. J Appl Physiol, 2004, 97 ( 5 ) : 1946- 1953. DOI: 10.1152/jappiphysiol. 01282. 2003.
  • 3Cox G, Miller JD, Mcwilliams A, et al. Bronchial thermoplasty for asthma[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2006, 173(9) :965- 969. DOI : 10.1164/rccm. 200507-1162OC.
  • 4Cox G, Thomson NC, Rubin AS, et al. Asthma control during the year after bronchial thermoplasty[ J]. N Engl J Med, 2007, 356 ( 13 ) : 1327-1337. DOI : 10. 1056/NEJMoa064707.
  • 5Thomson NC, RubinAS, NivenRM, et al. Long-term (5 year) safety of bronchial thermoplasty: Asthma Intervention Research (AIR) trial[J]. BMC Pulm Med, 2011, 11:8. DOI: 10. 1186/ 1471-2466-11-8.
  • 6Castro M, Rubin A, Laviolette M, et al. Effectiveness and safety of bronchial thermoplasty in the treatment of severe asthma: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial[J].Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2010, 181 (2) :116-124. DOI: 10. l164/rccm. 200903-0354OC.
  • 7Castro M, RubinA, LavioletteM, et al. Persistence of effectiveness of bronchial thermoplasty in patients with severe asthma[ J ]. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol, 2011, 107 ( 1 ) : 65- 70. DOI: 10. 1016/j. anai. 2011.03. 005.
  • 8Wechsler ME, Laviolette M, Rubin AS, et al. Bronchial thermoplasty: Long-term safety and effectiveness in patients with severe persistent asthma[ J]. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2013, 132 (6) : 1295-302. DOI : 10.1016/j. jaci. 2013.08. 009.
  • 9Cox PG, Miller J, Mitzner W, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of airway smooth muscle for sustained treatment of asthma: preliminary investjgation [J].Eur Respir J, 2004, 24 ( 4 ) : 659- 663. DOI : 10. 1183/09031936.04. 00054604.
  • 10Benayoun L, Druilhe A, Dombret MC, et al. Airway structural alterations selectively associated with severe asthma [ J ]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2003, 167 (10) : 1360-1368. DOI: 10. 1164/recm. 200209-1030OC.

二级参考文献25

  • 1American Thoracic Society Workshop Report.Proceedings of the ATS workshop on refractory asthma:current understanding,recommendations,and unanswered questions.Am J Respir Crit Care Med,2000,162:2341-2351.
  • 2Chung KF,Godard P,Adelroth E,et al.Difficult/therapyresistant asthma:the need for an integrated approach to define clinical phenotypes,evaluate risk factors,understand pathophysiology and find novel therapies.ERS Task Force on Difficult/Therapy-Resistant Asthma.European Respiratory Society.Eur Respir J,1999,13:1198-1208.
  • 3ten Brinke A,Sterk PJ,Masclee AA,et al.Risk factors of frequent exacerbations in difficult-to-treat asthma.Eur Respir J,2005,26:812-818.
  • 4American Thoracic Society. Proceedings of the ATS workshop onrefractory asthma : current understanding,recommendations,andunanswered questions[ J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2000,162.6) :2341-2351.
  • 5ERS Task Force on Difficult/Therapy-Resistant Asthma, EuropeanRespiratory Society. Difficult/therapy-resistant asthma : the needfor an integrated approach to define clinical phenotypes,evaluaterisk factors,understand pathophysiology and find novel therapies[J]. Eur Respir J,1999,13(5) : 1198-1208.
  • 6Chung KF,Wenzel SE,Brozek JL,et al. International ERS/ATSguidelines on definition,evaluation and treatment of severe asthma[J].Eur Respir J, 2014, 43(2):343-373.
  • 7Lee JH, Haselkom T, Borish L, et al. Risk factors associatedwith persistent airflow limitation in severe or difficult-to-treatasthma : insights from the TENOR study [ J ]. Chest, 2007,132(6) : 1882-1889.
  • 8ten Brinke A, Sterk PJ, MascleeAA, et al. Risk factors offrequent exacerbations in difficult-to-treat asthma [ J ]. Eur RespirJ,2005, 26(5):812-818.
  • 9Silverman RA, Boudreaux ED, Woodruff PG, et al. Cigarettesmokingamong asthmatic adults presenting to 64 emergencydepartments[ J]. Chest,2003, 123(5) : 1472-1479.
  • 10Chung KF. New treatments for severe treatment-resistant asthma :targeting the right patient[ J]. Lancet Respir Med, 2013 ,1(8):639-652.

共引文献30

同被引文献218

引证文献36

二级引证文献3616

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部