期刊文献+

论欧盟国家卫生制度设计的团结安排及变化趋势 被引量:3

Solidarity as a system design element for the European health care system and its trend
下载PDF
导出
摘要 团结思想是欧洲卫生公平和卫生政策的重要基础,但正不断受到个人责任、自由主义、私营化改革等新理念冲击,在部分欧洲国家甚至存在因资源匮乏而加大个人自付弱化团结的危险。但团结仍然是欧洲卫生体制安排最具标志的价值观之一,并继续成为欧洲政府对卫生安排的政治承诺和问责的道德基础。在从大政府走向大社会这一全球医改浪潮中,欧洲多国政府通过加强精细化监管来进一步实现卫生系统团结。 Solidarity is the foundation of European health care and policy. However,it is constantly discussed by the new concept of personal responsibility,liberalism and privatization. In some European countries,out of pocket money was used more because of the limited resources which indeed weakened the solidarity,an element which consistently marks the difference among the European Union countries,and the main source of European political commitment and accountability associated with health. In the universal health care reform tide,the European government restrains its power in detailed operation on the health care and pharmaceuticals delivery,medical insurance design,and health resource allocation,but this is done through more specific supervision to ensure solidarity in health care system.
作者 峗怡
出处 《中国卫生政策研究》 CSCD 北大核心 2016年第1期52-57,共6页 Chinese Journal of Health Policy
基金 国家社会科学基金青年项目(13CZX082)
关键词 团结 欧洲 卫生改革 福利 自由主义 Solidarity Europe Health care reform Welfare Liberalism
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1丁东红.论福利国家理论的渊源与发展[J].中共中央党校学报,2011,15(2):55-60. 被引量:14
  • 2Paris V, Devaux M, Wei L. Health Systems InstitutionalCharacteristics : A Survey of 29 OECD Countries [ R ].OECD Health Working Papers No. 50, 2010.
  • 3Van der Zee J,Boerma W G W, Kroneman M W. Healthcare systems: Understanding the stages of development[M]// Jones R. Oxford textbook of primary medical care,vol. 1. Oxford : Oxford University Press,2004.
  • 4Wagstaif Adam. Social Health Insurance vs. Tax-FinancedHealth Systems-Evidence from the OECD, Policy researchworking paper #4821 [ R ]. Washington D C: The WorldBank, 2009.
  • 5Hoedemaekers R, Dekkers W. Key concepts in health carepriority setting[ J]. Health Care Analysis,2003,11(4):309-323.
  • 6Hoedemaekers R,Dekkers W. Justice and solidarity in pri-ority setting in health care [ J ]. Health Care Analysis,2003,11(4) : 325-343.
  • 7Valerio L, Ricciardi W. The current status of decision-mak-ing procedures and quality assurance in Europe : an overview[J ]. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 2011,14(4): 383-396.
  • 8Focus on health spending [ EB/OL] . [2015-11-20 ] . ht-tp://www. oecd. org/health/health-systems/Focus-Health-Spending-2015. pdf.
  • 9Meulen R T, Jotterand F. Individual Responsibility andSolidarity in European Health Care Further Down the Roadto Two-Tier System of Health Care [ J ] . Journal of Medicineand Philosophy, 2008, 33(3) : 191-197.
  • 10R Ter Meulen,J van der Made. The extent and limits ofsolidarity in Dutch health care [ J ] . International Journal ofSocial Welfare, 2000, 9(4) : 250-260.

二级参考文献15

  • 1[德].弗·恩格斯.家庭、私有制和国家的起源[C]//中共中央编译局.马克思恩格斯选集:第4卷.北京:人民出版社,1972:169.
  • 2[加]R·米什拉.社会政策与福利政策:全球化的视角[M].郑秉文,译.北京:中国劳动社会保障出版社,2007:4-5.
  • 3Ma J, Lu M, Quan H. From a national, centrally planned health system to a system based on the market: Lessons from China [J]. Health Affairs, 2008, 27(4):937-948.
  • 4Blumenthal D, Hsiao W. Privatization and its discontents- the evolving Chinese health care system [ J ]. New England Journal of Medicine, 2005, 353( 11 ) : 1165-1170.
  • 5Van de Ven WPMM, Schut F T. Universal mandatory health insurance in the Netherlands: A model for the united states? [J]. Health Affairs, 2008, 27(3) : 771-781.
  • 6Schut F T. Workable competition in health care: Prospects for the Dutch design [ J ]. Social Science & Medicine, 1992, 35(12): 1445-1455.
  • 7Van de Van WPMM, Schut F T. The first decade of market oriented health care reforms in the Netherlands [ R ]. Rotter- dam: Instituut Beleid & Management Gezondheidzorg, 2000.
  • 8Enthoven A. Consumer choice health plan [ J ]. New Eng- land Journal of Medicine, 1978, 298(650) : 709-720.
  • 9Enthoven A. Theory and practice of managed competition in health care finance [ M ]. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Pub- lishers, 1988.
  • 10OECD Health Data: OECD c2009 [EB/OL]. [2011-05- 23 ]. http ://stats. oecd. org/BrandedView, aspx? oecd_bv_ id = heahh-data-en&doi = data-00348-en.

共引文献16

同被引文献24

  • 1中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会统计信息中心.2015年4月底全国医疗卫生机构数[EB/OL].(2015-06-17)l2015-12-22].http://www.nhfpc.gov.cn/mohwsbwstjxxzx/s7967/201506/9e460a73534b42e3b34968ee20e4160fs.html.
  • 2WHO. Filling the gap within a generation [ Z] . 2008.
  • 3David B, William lq. Lessons from the East China's rapidly evolving health care system [ J]. New England Journal of Medicine, 2015, 372 (14): 1281-1285.
  • 4Huang Y. The sick manofAsia [J]. Foreign Affair, 2011, (6): 119 - 136.
  • 5Pierre J, Peters BG. Governing complex societies: trajectories and scenarios [ M] . Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005 : 16 - 17.
  • 6Winnie Y, William H. Harnessing the privatisation of China' s fragmented health - care delivery [ J ]. Lancet, 2014, 384 (9945): 805 -818.
  • 7徐长恩,全世超,周新朝,王若蛟,温建明,潘景业.双向转诊下转难影响因素量化分析[J].中国卫生事业管理,2009,26(6):373-375. 被引量:12
  • 8李奇峰,王小万.欧洲卫生系统对人口健康的改善作用[J].国外医学(卫生经济分册),2010,27(4):153-157. 被引量:1
  • 9罗莉,胡蕊,孙肖潇,田建新,崔欣,于庆华,罗灿,曹文妹,齐贵新,陈刚.全国卫生监督机构人员数量及编制情况分析[J].中国卫生监督杂志,2011,18(5):409-413. 被引量:14
  • 10冯芮华,刘英,王小万.欧洲各国基于问责制的卫生系统绩效评估[J].国外医学(卫生经济分册),2011,28(4):153-157. 被引量:2

引证文献3

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部