期刊文献+

汉语刑事辩护词中态度资源的分布——作为社会过程的法律语篇研究之四 被引量:5

Distributional Features of Attitudinal Resources in Statements of Defense in Chinese Criminal Trials: Legal discourse as social process(4)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 汉语刑事辩护词作为法律语篇,是一种竞争类社会过程,承载着较重的人际语义负荷。本文从评价系统视角研究汉语刑事辩护词的态度资源及其分布特征。通过分析,我们发现汉语刑事辩护词中使用最多的态度资源是裁决,其次是鉴赏和情感。态度资源的分布特征是,论点部分中的必选资源是裁决,可选资源是鉴赏和/或情感;论证部分中的必选资源是以裁决为主并辅以鉴赏,可选资源是情感;结论部分中的态度资源分布与论点部分的相同。 The statement of defense in Chinese criminal trial is a kind of competitive social process with a heavy load of interpersonal meaning. Within the framework of the APPRAISAL Systems, this paper ex- plores the attitudinal resources and their distributional features in statements of defense in Chinese criminal trials. Through the analyses, it is found that the most-widely used attitudinal resource is Judgment, with Appreciation and Affect next to it. The distributional feature of these attitudinal resources in the stages of statements of defense is as follows: in Thesis, Judgment is compulsory, Appreciation and/or Affect are optional; in Argument, Judgment affiliated by Appreciation is compulsory, and Affect is optional; in Conclusion, the distribution of attitudinal resources is the same to that in Thesis.
出处 《山东外语教学》 2016年第2期13-21,共9页 Shandong Foreign Language Teaching
基金 2013年度上海交通大学文科科研资助项目"作为社会过程的法律语篇--语篇语义学视角"(项目编号:13TS02)系列论文之一
关键词 汉语刑事辩护词 态度资源 态度韵律 分布特征 statements of defense in Chinese criminal trials attitudinal resources attitudinal prosody distributional features
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Coley, J. M. & W. M. O' Barr. Just Words: Law, Language and Power[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.
  • 2Drew, P. Strategies in the contest between lawyer and witness in cross-examination[A]. In N. L. Judith & A. G. Walker (eds.). Language in the Judicial Process[ C]. New York: Plenum Press, 1990.39 -64.
  • 3Gibbons, J. Forensic Linguistics : An Introduction to Language in Justice System [ M ]. Malden : Blackwell Pub- lishers, 2003.
  • 4Hu, Y. The Standardization and Artistry of Language in Chinese Criminal Defense : From the Perspective of Goal Principle[ D]. China University of Political Science and Law, 2011.
  • 5Hyland, K. A genre description of the argumentative essay[J]. RELC Journal, 1990,21.66 -78.
  • 6Martin, J. R. Beyond exchange: APPRAISAL systems in English [ A ]. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson ( eds. ). Evaluation in Text : Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse [ C ]. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2000. 142 - 175.
  • 7Martin, J. R. & P. White. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English[M]. New York: Palgrave Mac- millan, 2005.
  • 8Thompson, G. Introducing Functional Grammar[ M]. London: Edward Arnold, 1996. /北京:外语教学与研究出版社,2000.
  • 9Tiersma, P. M. Legal Language[ M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.
  • 10崔凤娟,苗兴伟.律师庭审辩护词中模糊限制语的顺应理论研究[J].西安外国语大学学报,2009,17(2):38-41. 被引量:9

二级参考文献93

共引文献1161

同被引文献31

引证文献5

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部