期刊文献+

无创性超声测定冠状动脉支架术后再狭窄患者血管内皮功能和循环内皮祖细胞水平 被引量:9

Noninvasive ultrasound evaluation of vascular endothelial function and circulating endothelial progenitor cells on restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的运用无创性超声诊断技术测定经皮冠状动脉介入术(PCI)治疗急性心肌梗死(AMI)愈后冠状动脉支架再狭窄(ISR)患者的血管内皮功能,并探讨血管内皮功能与循环内皮祖细胞(EPCs)水平变化特点。方法选取2009—2015年川北医学院附属医院收治的完成冠状动脉造影随访的急性心肌梗死(AMI)后行PCI治疗患者220例。29例患者PCI治疗AMI后发生ISR(ISR组),191例患者PCI治疗AMI后未发生ISR(非ISR组)。采用高频超声技术获取患者肱动脉内皮依赖性功能(FMD)、非内皮依赖性功能(NMD)和颈动脉内膜中层厚度(IMT),同时检测循环EPCs表达水平。用独立样本t检验比较ISR组与非ISR组患者IMT、FMD、NMD、CD133+/KDR+EPCs、CD34+/KDR+EPCs、CD34+EPCs、CD133+EPCs、KDR+EPCs水平差异;采用单因素及多因素非条件Logistic回归分析筛选冠状动脉ISR的独立预测因子。结果 ISR组患者糖化血红蛋白(Hb A1c)、尿素氮、肌酐浓度均高于非ISR组患者,且差异均有统计学意义(t值分别为-1.769、-3.671、2.77,P均<0.05),血管紧张素转化酶抑制剂/血管紧张素受体拮抗剂、周围血管扩张剂、胰岛素、利尿剂使用率均高于非ISR组患者,硝酸甘油使用率低于非ISR组患者,且差异均有统计学意义(χ2值分别为3.832、6.567、2.072、16.540、4.949,P均<0.05)。2组患者IMT、FMD差异均无统计学意义,但ISR组患者NMD低于非ISR组患者,且差异有统计学意义(t=2.338,P均<0.05)。2组患者CD34+EPCs、CD133+EPCs水平差异均无统计学意义;ISR组患者CD34/KDR+EPCs、CD133/KDR+EPCs、KDR+EPCs水平均较非ISR组患者降低,且差异均有统计学意义(t值分别为2.298、3.986、2.106,P均<0.05)。Logistic回归分析结果显示,Hb A1c浓度、硝酸甘油使用率、利尿剂使用率、NMD是ISR的独立预测因子。结论阶段性血糖水平等危险因素控制不良,损害血管壁功能,减少循环EPCs数量,结合老年冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病患者置入支架的特定人群和临床用药合理性等因素综合作用下,促进PCI后ISR发生。高频超声技术可以快速、无创测定血管内皮功能,间接反映冠状动脉受损情况,在PCI后ISR发生的风险因素评估中准确评价血管结构和功能变化,为临床治疗提供重要的诊断和治疗依据。 Objective To investigate the changes of vascular endothelium function detected by noninvasive ultrasound and circulating endothelial progenitor cells(EPCs) on in-stent restenosis(ISR) after percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) in patients with acute myocardial infarction(AMI). Methods Totally 220 AMI patients with previous PCI and coronary angiography follow-up(3-147 months) were recruited from medical outpatient and inpatient clinic. All patients were divided into ISR(n=29) and non ISR(n=191) group. Endothelium-dependent flow-mediated dilation(FMD), nitroglycerin mediated dilatation(NMD), intima-media thickness(IMT) and circulating EPCs levels were measured by flow cytometry and echocardiography. IMT, FMD, NMD, CD133/KDR + EPCs, CD34/KDR + EPCs, CD34 + EPCs, CD133 + EPCs, KDR + EPCs were compared using an independent sample t-test between the two groups(ISR and non ISR). To assess which factors were associated with ISR, statistical analysis was performed through single and multiple factors unconditioned logistic regression analysis. Results Compared with non ISR patients, ISR patients had significantly unfavorable results on Hb A1 c, urea nitrogen and creatinine(t value=-1.769,-3.671 and 2.77 respectively, all P〈0.05), and received more intensive treatment of ACEI/ARB, insulin, vasodilator and diuretics(χ2 value=3.832, 6.567, 2.072, 16.540 and 4.949 respectively, all P〈0.05). Meanwhile, there were no difference on IMT and FMD between ISR and non ISR groups. However, patients with ISR had lower NMD compared with non ISR patients(t value=-2.338, P〈0.05). Patients with ISR had lower circulating CD34/KDR + EPCs, CD133/KDR + EPCs and KDR + EPCs counts compared with non ISR patients(t value=2.298, 3.986, 2.106 respectively, all P〈0.05). Logistic regression analysis revealed that Hb A1 c, NMD, diuretics and glyceryl trinitrate were independent predictors of ISR. Conclusions Cardiovascular risk factors, including poor control of Hb A1 C, damaged arterial smooth muscle, declined vascular function, and reduced circulating CD34/KDR + EPCs, CD 133/KDR + EPCs and KDR + EPCs, promoted the development of ISR after percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly patients with PCI. High-frequency ultrasound technology can be a fast, non-invasive method in measurement of endothelial function indirectly reflecting the damage of coronary artery, and can be used as a perfect tool to monitor the changes of peripheral vascular function and provide important information on risk prediction in patients after PCI.
出处 《中华医学超声杂志(电子版)》 CSCD 2016年第6期424-429,共6页 Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound(Electronic Edition)
关键词 超声检查 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 急性心肌梗死 冠状动脉支架再狭窄 内皮功能 循环内皮祖细胞 Ultrasonography Percutaneous coronary intervention Acute myocardial infarction In-stent restenosis Endothelial function Endothelial progenitor cells
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Looser PM, Kim LK, Feldman DN. In-Stent Restenosis: Pathophysiology and Treatment [J]. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med, 2016, 18(2): 10.
  • 2Alley H, Owens CD, Gasper WJ, et al. Ultrasound assessment of endothelial-dependent flow-mediated vasodilation of the brachial artery in clinical research [J]. J Vis Exp, 2014, 22(92): e52070.
  • 3Yue WS, Lau KK, Siu CW, et al. Impact of glycemic control on circulating endothelial progenitor cells and arterial stiffness in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus [J]. Cardiovasc Diabetol, 2011, 10:113.
  • 4Hochman JS, Lamas GA, Bullet CE, et al. Coronary intervention for persistent occlusion after myocardial infarction [J]. N Engl J Med, 2006, 355(23): 2395-2407.
  • 5Shimonaga T, Kurisu S, Watanabe N, et al. Myocardial injury after percutaneous coronary intervention for in-stent restenosis versus de novo stenosis [J]. Intern Med, 2015, 54(18): 2299-2305.
  • 6Hochman JS, Reynolds HR, Dzavik V, et al. Long-term effects of percutaneous coronary intervention of the totally occluded infarct-related artery in the subacute phase after myocardial infarction [J]. Circulation, 2011, 124(21): 2320-2328.
  • 7Lan H, Wang Y, Yin T, et al. Progress and prospects of endothelial progenitor cell therapy in coronary stent implantation [J]. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 2015. [Epub ahead of print].
  • 8Steinlaom BS, Loscalzo J, Michel T. Nitroglycerin and Nitric Oxide-A Rondo of Themes in Cardiovascular Therapeutics [J]. N Engl J Med, 2015, 373(3): 277-280.
  • 9Irate C, Carallo C, ScaveUi F, et al. Blood viscosity in subjects with normoglycemia and prediabetes [J]. Diabetes Care, 2014, 37(2): 488-492.
  • 10陈劲松,陈韵岱,田峰,韩运峰,荆晶,刘杰,王晶,周珊珊.冠心病合并糖尿病患者药物洗脱支架置入后2年支架内再狭窄的预测因素[J].中华心血管病杂志,2014,42(1):14-18. 被引量:14

二级参考文献15

  • 1Serruys PW,de Jaegere P,Kiemeneij F. A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease[J].New England Journal of Medicine,1994.489-495.
  • 2Zahn R,Hamm CW,Schneider S. Incidence and predictors of target vessel revascularization and clinical event rates of the sirolimus-eluting coronary stent (results from the prospective multicenter German Cypher Stent Registry)[J].American Journal of Cardiology,2005.1302-1308.
  • 3Mauri L,Silbaugh TS,Wolf RE. Long-term clinical outcomes after drug-eluting and bare-metal stenting in Massachusetts[J].CIRCULATION,2008.1817-1827.
  • 4Lemos PA,Serruys PW,van Domburg RT. Unrestricted utilization of sirolimus-eluting stents compared with conventional bare stent implantation in the " real world":the RapamycinEluting Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) registry[J].CIRCULATION,2004.190-195.
  • 5Stolker JM,Kennedy KF,Lindsey JB. Predicting restenosis of drug-eluting stents placed in real-world clinical practice:derivation and validation of a risk model from the EVENT registry[J].Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging,2010.327-334.
  • 6Tsigkas GG,Karantalis V,Hahalis G. Stent restenosis,pathophysiology and treatment options:a 2010 update[J].The Hellenic Journal of Cardiology,2011.149-157.
  • 7Matsushita K,Mahmoodi BK,Woodward M. Comparison of risk prediction using the CKD-EP1 equation and the MDRD study equation for estimated glomerular filtration rate[J].Journal of the American Medical Association,2012.1941-1951.
  • 8Wang JW,Chen YD,Wang CH. Development and validation of a clinical risk score predicting the no-reflow phenomenon in patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction[J].CARDIOLOGY,2013.153-160.
  • 9Sales RK,Vargas FS,Capelozzi VL. Predictive models for diagnosis of pleural effusions secondary to tuberculosis or cancer[J].Respirology,2009.1128-1133.
  • 10Akcakoyun M,Kargin R,Tanalp AC. Predictive value of noninvasively determined endothelial dysfunction for long-term cardiovascular events and restenosis in patients undergoing coronary stent implantation:a prospective study[J].Coronary Artery Disease,2008.337-343.

共引文献13

同被引文献88

引证文献9

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部