期刊文献+

井漏失返条件下的吊灌作业安全时间计算方法 被引量:3

Calculation of safe time in "Hang's Mudding-off" technique of circulation loss in return
下载PDF
导出
摘要 "吊灌"作业是在井漏失返条件下保持井内压力动态平衡、获得安全作业时间的重要措施。但在实施吊灌作业时,由于反映井筒内环空液面变化规律的动态数模分析方法缺失,不能为工程实践提供吊灌的合理依据,使其基本处于"盲吊"状态。为此,笔者根据"吊灌"技术实际工况,首次采用井筒漏失动态分析方法,建立起吊灌安全作业时间数学模型,给出了多种漏失速率的积分结果,并结合现场实例对计算结果进行了验证。结果表明:(1)利用计算实例对数学模型的可靠性进行检验,计算结果与实际数据高度吻合;(2)适当增加吊灌量可以增加安全作业时间;(3)适当减少吊灌钻井液密度也可以增加安全作业时间。结论认为:该成果可以从根本上解决"吊灌"技术的安全作业时间准确计算问题,对于规避井漏失返条件下的井控安全风险、实现"吊灌"技术优化、降低工程费用等都具有重要意义。 The so-called "Hang's Mudding-off" technique is critical to keeping the dynamic pressure balance and guaranteeing the sufficient safe operation time in wellbore. However, for lack of dynamic mathematical model analysis methods for reflecting the changes of annulus liquid level in the borehole during the "Hang's Mudding-off" operation, the actual operation is basically conducted blindly without reasonable engineering basis. According to the actual conditions, a mathematical model for the safe time of the "Hang's Mudding-off" was, for the first time, built up by using the dynamic borehole leakage analysis method. Then, the integral results of leak-off rates were calculated. Finally, the calculation results were verified by field cases. It is shown that the calculation results are highly accordant with the actual data, indicating the reliability of the mathematical model. The safe operation time can be increased by increasing mud amount or reducing mud density appropriately. With this model, the safe time of "Hang's Mudding-off" operation can be calculated accurately. This research result is of great significance to avoiding well control risk of absorption wells, optimizing the "Hang's Mudding-off" technique and reducing project cost.
出处 《天然气工业》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第7期63-67,共5页 Natural Gas Industry
关键词 压力控制 井漏失返 吊灌技术 液面监测 数学建模 动态平衡 安全时间 漏失速率 Pressure control Circulation loss in return "Hang's Mudding-off" technique Liquid level monitoring Mathematical model Dynamic pressure balance Safe time Leak-off rate
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1林安村.“吊灌”法在完井和堵漏作业中的应用[J].天然气工业,1983,3(1):31-33.
  • 2张恒晨,曾明昌,张本杰.川东天然气勘探新区钻井技术发展战略研究[J].天然气工业,1997,17(5):39-43. 被引量:4
  • 3胥永杰,黄卫平,曾庆旭.四川盆地高陡构造碳酸盐岩钻井技术发展方向[J].天然气工业,2000,20(3):47-50. 被引量:14
  • 4Reyna E. Case history of floating mud cap drilling techniques: Ar- dalin Field, Timan Pechoran Basin, Russia[C]//SPE/IADC Drilling Conference, 28 February-2 March 1995, Amsterdam, The Nether- lands. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10,2118/29423-MS.
  • 5韩烈祥.川东高陡构造钻井工艺的合理配套探讨[J].天然气工业,1998,18(2):32-35. 被引量:2
  • 6Sweep MN, Bailey JM, Stone CR. Closed hole circulation drill- ing: Case study of drilling a high-pressure fractured reservoir-Ten- giz Field, Tengiz, Republic of Kazakhstan[C]//SPE/IADC Drilling Conference, 19-21 February 2003, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10,2118/79850-MS.
  • 7Runtuwene M, Suprihono S, Rizka D, PrasetiaAE, Toralde JS, Nas SW. Pressurized mud cap drilling drastically reduces non-pro- ductive time in Soka Field, South Sumatera[C]//Middle East Drill- ing Technology Conference & Exhibition, 26-28 October 2009, Manama, Bahrain. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10,2118/125311-MS.
  • 8Darmawan GR, Susilo SD, Toralde JS. Successful installation and operation of downhole isolation valve combined with pressurized mud cap drilling to safely develop sour gas, fractured-limestone reservoir in Gundih Field, Indonesia[C]//SPE European Health, Safety and Environmental Conference in Oil and Gas Explo- ration and Production, 22-24 February 2011, Vienna, Austria.
  • 9林安村.川渝油气田井控工艺技术反思[J].钻采工艺,2008,31(2):21-23. 被引量:3
  • 10曾明昌,曾时田,毛建华.气井喷漏同存的处理技术研究[J].天然气工业,2005,25(6):42-44. 被引量:31

二级参考文献78

共引文献172

同被引文献26

引证文献3

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部