摘要
关于盗窃罪等财产罪的法益,在德国,有法律的财产说、经济的财产说与法律的·经济的财产说的对立;在日本,有本权说与占有说的对立;在我国,所有权说处于通说地位,近年也出现了一些有力学说。盗窃罪保护法益的确定,涉及刑法的法益保护机能与社会秩序维护机能之间的平衡。应当立足于刑法独特的价值取向,坚持违法的相对性、刑法原则上禁止私力救济以及盗窃罪是对个别财产犯罪的立场,综合考虑刑法与民法的不同与协调,采取"修正的本权说",即盗窃罪的法益是公私财产的所有权和其他本权(他物权、借贷权等),以及未经法定程序不得被剥夺(没收)的利益。特殊类型盗窃罪的法益也应当如此理解。
The determination of legal interest of Theft,involving the function of criminal law protection of legal interests and social order to maintain the balance between the performance problem. Based on the unique value orientation,Criminal Law should consider the difference and coordination in order to take "amended legal interest of Theft of ownership of the right,"that theft is legal interests and other public and private property ownership of the right( his property rights,lending rights,etc.) and may not be deprived without due process( confiscation) of interest. Legal interests of a particular type of theft should be understood in the some way.
出处
《河南财经政法大学学报》
2016年第6期84-101,共18页
Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law
关键词
盗窃罪
法益
修正的本权说
theft act
legal interest of theft
amended legal interest of theft of ownership of the right