期刊文献+

国外沟通和协作式规划近15年研究进展--基于Citespace Ⅲ软件的可视化分析 被引量:14

Review on Communicative Planning and Collaborative Planning Research of Foreign Countries in the Past 15 Years:A Visualized Analysis Based on CitespaceⅢ
下载PDF
导出
摘要 新型城镇化背景下,市民意识崛起,规划方法的转变亟需理论指导。简述沟通—协作式规划的理论要点,从文献时间分布、代表人物和文章、研究热点、研究趋势和内容五个方面切入,将Web of Science数据库中2000-2014年间关于沟通式规划、协作式规划共324篇论文,利用CitespaceⅢ软件进行可视化分析。最后,从"政府放权"、"公众参与"、"伙伴关系"、"制度设计"、"协作方法"、"规划评价"6个方面系统梳理了主要内容,以期能为我国规划理论研究和规划实践转型提供借鉴。 Under the background of New-type Urbanization, planners must pay close attention to citizens" necessity and planning practice is in great need of the invention of new forms, following the growing number of stock planning and the raise of the civil consciousness. This paper describes the theoretical points on communicative planning and collaborative planning. Displaying in five aspects, such as time distribution of papers, representative figures and articles, research focuses, research trends and research contents, a total of 324 papers on communicative planning and collaborative planning, from 2000 to 2014, in the Web of Science database were visually analyzed by Citespace Ⅲ. The result found that the research have experienced a process from theoretical basis to practical appliance. Then this paper classifies the research contents into "government decentralization", "public participation", "partnerships". "institutional design", "collaborative approach", "planning evaluation", the article is expected to provide instructions and references to research and transformation of practices on communicative planning and collaborative planning in China through the six contents.
出处 《现代城市研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第12期42-50,共9页 Modern Urban Research
基金 国家自然科学基金(项目编号:51678577) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(项目批准号:15lgjc38)联合资助
关键词 沟通式规划 协作式规划 CitespaceⅢ软件 可视化分析 communicative planning collaborative planning Citespace Ⅲ visualized analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献123

  • 1龙元.交往型规划与公众参与[J].城市规划,2004,28(1):73-78. 被引量:54
  • 2李艳红.大众传媒、社会表达与商议民主——两个个案分析[J].开放时代,2006(6):5-21. 被引量:54
  • 3[1]可以参考以下文献,如Meyerson和Banfield(1955),Castells(1977),Cockburn(1977),Saunders(1979),Ambrose(1986),Healey等(1986),Flyvbjerg(1998b).
  • 4[1]例如,参见Innes(1992),Innes等(1994),Malberl(1998),Tewdwr-Joncs与Thomas(1998),Innes与Booher(2000),Innes与Gruber(2001),McGuirk(2001),Woltjer(2000),Van Driesche与Lane(2002).
  • 5[1]Alexander,E.R.(1995)How Organisations Act Together:Interorganizational Coordination in Theory and Practice.Luxembourg:Gordon and Breach.
  • 6[2]Allmendinger,P.and Tewdwr-Jones,M.(eds)(2002)Planning Futures:New Directions for Planning Theory.London:Routledge.
  • 7[3]Ambrose,P.(1986)Whatever Happened to Planning?London:Methuen.
  • 8[4]Barrett,S.and Fudge,C.(1981)Policy and Action:Essays on the Implementation of Public Policy.London:Methuen.
  • 9[5]Bogason,P.(2000)Public Policy and Local Governance:Institutions in Postmodern Society.Cheltenham:Edward Elgar.
  • 10[6]Brenner,N.(1999)Globalisation as Reterritorialisation:The Re-scaling of Urban Governance in the European Union.Urban Studies,36(3):431-52.

共引文献53

同被引文献160

引证文献14

二级引证文献68

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部