期刊文献+

东方红四号增强型卫星平台优化验证经验与启示 被引量:5

Practice and Inspiration of DFH-4EPlatform Verification
下载PDF
导出
摘要 东方红四号增强型卫星平台(DFH-4E)开发过程中,为有效地降低验证工作费用、缩减验证周期并保证验证的充分性,按照系统工程理论,首次提出并采用了系统优化验证的方法,以一颗工程星来代替传统的结构星、电性星(热控星)等,实现"一星多用、综合验证"的目的,同时利用"工程星+热模拟舱+分系统+单机"的"集中+分散"式验证模式开展平台验证工作。利用该方法,有效地缩短了平台研制周期,降低了研制经费,完成了平台关键技术验证和平台系统级验证,达到了具备转入正样卫星研制的条件。DFH-4E平台验证实践表明,该优化验证方法是一种行之有效的提高验证效率的方法。 During the development process of DFH-4Esatellite platform,the system optimization methodology was raised and adopted for the first time.As a result the verification cost was effectively limited and the development duration was reduced.A system engineering satellite model,instead of the traditional structural model,electrical model(thermal model)etc.,was developed to achieve the purpose of"multi-utilization of one satellite model and integrative verification".The"integrated+individually"verification mode was implemented successfully through utilizing various model levels of"engineering satellite model+thermal cabin mock-up+subsystem + unit".Such innovative methodology was practically applied to prove the benefit of reducing development cost and duration.Critical technology verification and system verification on DFH-4Ebus was accomplished,which formed the basis of entering into flight satellite model development phase.Engineering verification is practically proved to become the methodology to increase verification efficiency.
出处 《航天器工程》 北大核心 2016年第6期13-17,共5页 Spacecraft Engineering
基金 基金项目:国家重大航天工程
关键词 卫星平台 东方红四号增强型卫星 优化 验证方法 satellite platform DFH-4Esatellite optimization verification methodology
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献73

  • 1李卫娜,潘燕华.复杂产品制造业成本控制模型初探[J].江苏科技大学学报(自然科学版),2006,20(5):90-94. 被引量:9
  • 2王希季;李大耀.卫星设计学[M]上海:上海科学技术出版社,1997.
  • 3AIAA Technical Committee for MDC. On current state art multidisciplinary design optimization,AIAA 91-60531[R].Washington D.C.:AIAA,1991.
  • 4Giesing J P,Barthelemy J M. A summary of industry MDO applications and needs[A].Washington D.C.:AIAA,1998.
  • 5Agte J,Weck O D,Sobieski J. MDO:assessment and direction for advancement-an opinion of one international group[J].Structural & Multidisciplinary Optimization,2010.17-33.
  • 6Sobieski J,Haftka R T. Multidisciplinary aerospace design optimization:survey of recent development[J].Structural & Multidisciplinary Optimization,1997,(01):1-23.
  • 7Hulme F K,Bloebaum L C. A comparison of solution strategies for simulation-based Multidisciplinary Design Optimization,AIAA 98-4977[R].Washington D.C.:AIAA,1998.
  • 8Balling R J,Sobieski J. Optimization of coupled systems:a critical overview of approach[J].AIAA Journal,1996,(01):6-17.doi:10.2514/3.13015.
  • 9Yi S I,Shin J K,Park G J. Comparison of MDO methods with mathematical examples[J].Structural & Multidisciplinary Optimization,2008.391-402.
  • 10Tedford N P,Martins J R. Comparison of MDO architectures within a universal framework,AIAA 2006-1617[A].Washington D.C.:AIAA,2006.

共引文献19

同被引文献31

引证文献5

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部