经鼻内窥镜鼻中隔矫正术与传统鼻中隔矫正术的临床比较分析

Analysis of Clinical Comparison of Intranasal Endoscopic Nasal Septal Construction and Traditional Nasal Septal Construction

目的探讨对需行鼻中隔矫正术的患者实施经鼻内窥镜鼻中隔矫正术与传统鼻中隔矫正术治疗的方法和临床效果。方法方便选取2014年4月—2016年4月该院收治的需行鼻中隔矫正术治疗的患者160例,随机分成两组,对80例对照组患者实施传统鼻中隔矫正术治疗,对观察组80例患者实施经鼻内窥镜矫正术治疗,观察两组患者的治疗效果。结果观察组患者在治疗有效率(88.75%vs 73.75%)及术中术后一般情况的比较结果上均明显优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对需行鼻中隔矫正术治疗的患者实施经鼻内窥镜鼻中隔矫正术治疗的疗效显著,且安全有效,值得临床进行推广。

Objective To discuss the treatment method and clinical effect of intranasal endoscopic nasal septal construction and traditional nasal septal construction. Methods 160 cases of patients needing the nasal septal construction in our hospital from April 2014 to April 2016 were convenient selected and randomly divided into two groups with 80 cases in each, the control group were treated with traditional nasal septal construction, while the observation group were treated with intranasal endoscopic nasal septal construction, and the treatment effect was compared between the two groups. Results The treatment effective rate and postoperative general condition in the observation group were obviously better than those in the control group, and the difference had statistical significance（88.75% vs 73.75%）（P〈0.05）. Conclusion The curative effect of intranasal endoscopic nasal septal construction for patients needing the nasal septal construction is obvious, and it is safe and effective, and it is worth clinical promotion.