期刊文献+

新疆区域内液体流量标准装置计量能力评价 被引量:3

Evaluation of Measuring Capacity of Liquid Flow-rate Standard Device in Xinjiang
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了客观评价新疆区域内液体流量标准装置的计量能力,新疆计量院开展了一次全疆范围内的液体流量标准装置比对工作,共有7个单位参加。比对的传递标准为一台质量流量计和一台电磁流量计,采用花瓣式传递路线,在42天的时间内顺利完成;以主导实验室的数据作为参考值,并结合传递标准稳定性、重复性等数据确定参考值的不确定度;依据各参比实验室提交的实验数据进行En值计算;结果显示A1实验室的2个流量点的En值均大于1,其他实验室和其他流量点的En值均小于1。依据评价准则,判定A1实验室比对结果为不满意,其他实验室比对结果为满意。比对合格率为86%,对A1实验室整改后再次进行比对试验,比对结果为满意。此次比对充分评价了新疆范围内液体流量计量的整体能力,保证了全疆范围内液体流量计量仪表量值溯源的准确性和一致性。 In order to objectively evaluate the measuring capacity of liquid flow-rate standard device in Xinjiang region, XinjiangMetrology Institute organized a comparison of liquid flow-rate standard device measurement, and 7 units in Xinjiang area took part inthe activity. The transfer standard for the comparison is a mass flowmeter and an electromagnetic flowmeter. The transmission line ispetal-shaped, and the comparison transmission process took 42 days; taking the data of the leading laboratory as the reference value,the uncertainty of the reference value is determined according to the stability and repeatability data of the transfer standard; the Envalue was calculated according to the experimental data submitted by the compared laboratories; the results showed that the En valueof 2 flow-rate points in A1 laboratory is greater than 1, and the En value of the flow-rate points in other laboratories is all less than1. According to the evaluation criteria, the comparison results of A1 laboratory are not satisfied, the results of other laboratories aresatisfactory and the qualified rate of the comparison results is 86%. After the rectification of A1 laboratory, its comparison results aresatisfactory. The liquid flow-rate measurement capacity of overall Xinjiang area is evaluated by this comparison, which can ensure theaccuracy and consistency of the traceability of the liquid flow-rate meters in Xinjiang area.
出处 《石油工业技术监督》 2017年第5期55-57,共3页 Technology Supervision in Petroleum Industry
关键词 液体流量 标准装置 计量能力 评价 比对 新疆 liquid flow-rate standard device measuring capacity evaluation comparison Xinjiang
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献19

  • 1陈赓良.对天然气能量计量溯源性的若干认识[J].石油与天然气化工,2007,36(2):162-168. 被引量:19
  • 2陈赓良.对ISO技术报告TR 24094的几点认识——兼论能量计量的不确定度评价[J].石油工业技术监督,2007,23(8):5-9. 被引量:9
  • 3梁国伟,蔡武昌.流量测量技术及仪表[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2005:108-114.
  • 4国家质量监督检验检疫总局.计量比对[s]. JJF 1117-2010, 2010.
  • 5E. L. UPP, Paul J. LaNasa, Fluid Flow Measurement , A Practical Guide to Accurate Flow Measurement (Second Edi- tion) [ M]. Gulf professional Publishing, 2001.
  • 6C · P · Hoeks. Legal aspects and traceability of high pressure gas measurements in the Netherlands [ C ]. Service of metrol- ogy of Netherlands IMEKO--Conference on flow measurement of fluids Groningen the Netherlands September 11 -15, 1978.
  • 7全国认证认可标准化委员会.合格评定能力验证的通用要求:GB/T27043-2012[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2012.
  • 8中国国家标准化委员会.钻井液材料规范:GB/T5005-2010[S].北京:中国标准出版社.2010.
  • 9Petroleum and natural gas industries-Drilling fluid materi- als-Specifications and tests : ISO 13500 : 2008[S].
  • 10中国合格评定国家认可委员会.能力验证样品均匀性和稳定性评价指南:CNASGL03-2006[S].北京:[出版者不详],2006.

共引文献21

同被引文献11

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部