摘要
诉前禁令在制止知识产权侵权行为时能够发挥有效的作用,但法律规范的欠缺也会导致极大的风险。2015年《最高人民法院关于审查知识产权与竞争纠纷行为保全案件适用法律若干问题的解释(征求意见稿)》的出台,在诉前禁令审查标准上首次有了明确的提法。针对这一文件的相关规定,通过对域外诉前禁令审查标准的分析与对比,结合我国司法实践,提出诉前禁令标准审查的"中国四要素法",使之更具有操作性。
Right-holders usually face greater loss in IP infringement than general tort. So preliminary injunction plays an important role in giving the IP holders timely relief in current legal system. Since a draft judicial interpretation from the Supreme People＇s Court of China has been posted for consultation, we finally have a clear understanding of preliminary injunction, especially for the scope and the application standards. This article tries to analyze Article 7 ＆ 8 of the draft and conclude the application standards we need in current situation for preliminary injunction by comparing the domestic and abroad practices.
出处
《电子知识产权》
CSSCI
2017年第4期75-81,共7页
Electronics Intellectual Property
关键词
知识产权
诉前禁令
审查标准
Intellectual Property
Preliminary injunction
Application standards
