期刊文献+

会阴无创不保护分娩护理及临床效果 被引量:2

Nursing and clinical effect of perineum noninvasive and unprotected delivery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的总结临床中会阴无创不保护分娩的护理经验,探讨其应用效果。方法随机选取98例在我院进行分娩的产妇,将其均分为对照组和观察组,各39例,分别应用常规分娩护理和会阴无创不保护护理,观察两组产妇的产程时间、住院时间、会阴撕裂程度、产后出血量、产褥期感染情况以及新生儿窒息发生率。结果观察组产妇的产程时间、住院时间均明显短于对照组,会阴撕裂程度低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);但两组新生儿窒息率、产褥期感染发生率、产后2 h出血量等指标水平较为接近,差异不具有统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论给予正常分娩产妇会阴无创不保护分娩,结合有针对性的护理干预措施,能够有效减轻产妇分娩过程中对会阴的损伤。 Objective To summarize the nursing experience of perineum noninvasive and unprotected delivery in clinic, and to explore its application effect. Methods Ninety-eight cases of puerpera in our hospital for delivery were randomly selected and divided into control group and observation group, with 39 cases in each group, and they were used routine delivery nursing and perineum noninvasive and unprotected nursing respectively. The duration of labor, hospitalization, degree of perineal tear, postpartum hemorrhage, puerperal infection and the incidence of neonatal asphyxia were observed between the two groups. Results The duration of labor, hospitalization of the observation group were significantly shorter than those of the control group, the degree of perineal laceration was lower than that of the control group (P〈0.05). But the neonatal asphyxia, puerperal infection rate, postpartum hemorrhage in 2 h of the observation group were close to those of the control group (P〉0.05). Conclusion The perineum noninvasive and unprotected delivery combined with targeted care interventions for puerpera with normal delivery can effectively reduce maternal delivery during the perineal injury.
出处 《临床医学研究与实践》 2017年第12期161-162,共2页 Clinical Research and Practice
关键词 无保护分娩 常规分娩护理 实践效果 unprotected delivery routine delivery nursing practice effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献59

  • 1马明华.无保护会阴接生法降低初产妇会阴侧切率的效果观察[J].青海医药杂志,2012,42(6):73-73. 被引量:108
  • 2凌艳姣.会阴侧切伤口三种缝合方法硬结发生率的比较[J].护士进修杂志,2005,20(6):559-560. 被引量:71
  • 3董金林,倪美菊,朱钟治.会阴Ⅲ度撕裂50例分析[J].实用妇产科杂志,1996,12(3):153-154. 被引量:17
  • 4Thacker S B,Banta H D. Benefits and risks of episioto- my: An interpretative review of the English language lit- erature, 1860-1980 [J]. Obstet Gyneeol Surv, 1983, 38 (6) : 322-338.
  • 5Harrison R F,Brennan M,North P M,et al. Is routine episiotomy necessary? [J]. Br Med J, 1984,288 (6435) : 1971-1975.
  • 6Woolley R J. Benefits and risks of episiotomy: A review of the English-language literature since 1980. Part Ⅰ[J]. Obstet Gynecol Surv,1995,50(11) :806-820.
  • 7Eason E. Preventing perineal trauma during childbirth:A systematic review[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2000,95:464-471.
  • 8Neilson JP. Evidence based intrapartum care: evidence from the eorchrane library [J]. Int J Gnynecol Obstet, 1998,63(Supp[ 1) :S97-S102.
  • 9谢幸,苟文丽妇产科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2013:59.
  • 10Gawade P,, Markenson G, Bast F, et al. Association of ges- tational weight gain with cesarean delivery rate after labor in duetion[J].J Repmd Med, 2011, 56(3): 95.

共引文献221

同被引文献7

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部