期刊文献+

政制·宗教·教育——约翰·亚当斯论政治与道德的关系 被引量:1

Constitution,Religion and Education:John Adams's Viewpoint on the Relationship Between Politics and Morality
下载PDF
导出
摘要 现代政治和政治学兴起的根源在于各民族国家形成过程中经济的、政治的和军事的冲突,而且得益于文艺复兴以来的科学的研究方法。约翰·亚当斯继承和发展了马基雅维利的共和政体理论,但在道德与政治的关系的问题上有不同的认识。他更关心政制、宗教、普遍的国民教育与共和国的道德风俗之间的相互关系。他指出共和政治的运转应当主要依靠平衡政体所建立的法治而非道德,但是共和国有责任和义务通过鼓励宗教信仰和推行教育提高人民的道德水平,同时人民道德水平的提高有助于巩固平衡政体,维护共和国的稳定。平衡政体与道德两者互补共同为共和政治的纲要。 In modern times,Machiavelli was believed to have liberated politics from the ethics and he becamed the founder of modern politics. The viewpoint that politics and morality were two independent kingdoms had almost become an unalterable statement. In fact,the rise of modern politics was rooted in the economic,political and martial conflict in the process of the formation of nation-state,and benefited from the scientific research methods since the Renaissance. John Adams inherited and developed Machiavelli's republicanism theory,but for the relationship between morality and political,he paid more attention to the interrelationship of moral customs and balance constitution. He pointed out that politics and morality should not harm each other,the operation of republic politics should rely mainly on the system architecture of the rule of law instead of morality,a free government had the responsibility and obligation to improve people's moral level by encouraging religious belief and education,and people's moral level would help to strengthen the balanced polity and maintain the stability of the Republic. The two complementary together were key point for the republic.
作者 李浩
出处 《山西师大学报(社会科学版)》 2017年第6期39-43,共5页 Journal of Shanxi Normal University(Social Science Edition)
基金 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地项目(15JJD880011) 国家社科基金重大项目(13&ZD149)
关键词 政制 宗教 教育 道德 politics religion education morality
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献67

  • 1李秋零,田薇.启蒙主义的历史进步论[J].中国青年政治学院学报,1994,13(2):77-81. 被引量:4
  • 2王令愉.孔多塞:法国最后一位启蒙思想家[J].华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1995,27(1):18-23. 被引量:2
  • 3马基雅维利.《君主论·李维史论》,第325页,吉林出版集团,2011年版.
  • 4C.BradleyThompson,“JohnAdams’s Machiavellian Moment,”,Vol.57,No.3,Summer,1995,pp.389-417.
  • 5ZeraS.Fink,2nded.,Evanstan,IL.:Northwestern University Press,1962.
  • 6J.G.A.Pocock,Princeton:Princeton UniversityPress,1975.
  • 7LanceBanning,Ithaca,NY.:CornellUniversityPress,1978,pp.21-91.
  • 8LeoStrauss,Chicago:UniversityofChicagoPress,1988,pp.9-55.
  • 9ThomasPangle,Chicago:UniversityofChicagoPress,1988,pp.41-128.
  • 10PaulRahe,ChapelHill,NC.:UniversityofNorthCarolinaPress,1992,pp.231-782.

共引文献2

同被引文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部