期刊文献+

CBL联合PDCA循环标准化教学模式对护生评判性思维的影响 被引量:15

Influence of CBL combined with PDCA cycle standardized teaching mode on critical thinking of nursing students
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]探讨病例讨论为基础的教学方法(CBL)联合PDCA循环标准化教学对护生评判性思维的影响。[方法]将在西安医学院第二附属医院实习的护生72人随机分为两组各36人,观察组采用CBL联合PDCA循环标准化教学模式,对照组采用传统的讲授式教学方法,比较两种教学模式实施前后护生的评判性思维得分,并了解观察组护生对标准化教学模式的评价。[结果]观察组护生实施前评判性思维能力总分为(266.31±21.77)分,实施后总分为(351.86±5.72)分,实施前后总分及各维度评分比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。对照组实施前总分为(242.51±18.30)分,实施后总分为(273.69±14.61)分,实施前后总分和系统化能力、认知成熟度评分比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组实施后总分及各维度评分比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。[结论]CBL联合PDCA循环标准化教学模式有利于培养护生的评判性思维和自主学习能力。 Objective:To explore the influence of case based learning method(CBL)combined with PDCA cycle standardized teaching on critical thinking of nursing students.Methods:A total of 72 nursing students in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Medical University were randomly divided into two groups with 36 patients in each group,patients in the observation group were given with CBL combined with PDCA cycle standardized teaching mode,while the control group were given with traditional teaching method,The critical thinking scores of nursing students before and after the implementation of the two teaching modes were compared,and the evaluation of standardized teaching model of nursing students in the observation group were observed.Results:Before and after the implementation,the total scores of the critical thinking ability of the observation group were(266.31±21.77)and(351.86±5.72),there was statistically significant of the total score and the score of each dimension in before and after the implementation.Before and after the implementation,the total scores of the control group were(242.51±18.30)and(273.69±14.61),there was statistically significant of the total score systematic ability and cognitive maturity score before and after the implementation(P<0.05).There was statistically significant of the total score and the score of each dimension after the implementation in the two groups(P<0.05).Conclusion:CBL combined with PDCA cycle standarilized teaching was beneficial to train critical thinking and autonomous learning ability of nursing students.
出处 《护理研究(下旬版)》 2017年第12期4652-4655,共4页 Chinese Nursing Researsh
基金 陕西省高等教育教学改革研究项目 编号:15BZ57 2014年度西安医学院本科教学改革研究项目 编号:2014JG-01
关键词 标准化教学模式 病例讨论 PDCA循环 评判性思维 评价 standardized teaching model case discussion PDCA cycle critical thinking evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献54

  • 1彭美慈,汪国成,陈基乐,陈满辉,白洪海,李守国,李继平,蔡芸芳,王君俏,殷磊.批判性思维能力测量表的信效度测试研究[J].中华护理杂志,2004,39(9):644-647. 被引量:1848
  • 2叶旭春,姜安丽,陈荣凤,李芳芳,沈洁,陈华莉,张敏悦.护理学基础教学中开展护理评判性思维教学的实践[J].解放军护理杂志,2005,22(9):94-95. 被引量:24
  • 3朱小平,邹碧容,肖清秋,程晓琳.概念式教学法在临床护理教学中的应用[J].护理学杂志,2006,21(24):59-60. 被引量:8
  • 4Betsy SP,Gloria M.Clarifying the concept of criti-cal thinking in nursing[J].The Journal of NursingEducation,1993,32(9):425-428.
  • 5Patricia Mccarthy,Pamela Schuster,Pearl Zehr,etal.Evaluation of critical thinking in a baccalaure-ate nursing program[J].Journal of Nursing Edu-cation,1999,38(3):142-144.
  • 6Facione PA, Facione NC, Giancario CAF. The California critical thinking disposition inventory, CCTDI scoring supplement. Millbrae, CA: The California Academic Press, 2000.
  • 7Facione PA, Facione NC. The California critical thinking disposition inventory (CCTDI). Test administration manual. Millbrae, CA: California Academic Press, 1992.
  • 8Ip WY, Lee DTF, Lee IFK, et al. Disposition towards critical thinking: a study of Chinese undergraduate nursing students. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2000, 32(1):84-90.
  • 9Yeh ML. Assessing the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the california critical thinking disposition inventory. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 2002, 39(2):123-132.
  • 10Albert RT, Albert RE, Radsma J. Relationships among bilingualism, critical thinking ability, and critical thinking disposition. Journal of Professional Nursing, 2002, 18(4):220-229.

共引文献1986

同被引文献147

引证文献15

二级引证文献62

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部