期刊文献+

大型综合医院临床研究伦理审查信息管理系统的设计与实现 被引量:13

Design and implementation of information management system for clinical research ethics review in large general hospitals
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨涉及人体临床研究伦理审查信息管理系统在伦理审查工作中的设计与实现。方法依据ICH—GCP、临床试验管理规范(GCP)、《涉及人体的生物医学研究伦理审查办法》及符合亚太地区SIDCER认证标准的标准操作规程及笔者工作经验进行系统设计与实现结果根据实际工作流程设计实现了伦理管理系统“研究者一管理业务人员一评审专家”三位一体的实时在线互动工作模式,为下一步系统的优化升级奠定基础。结论伦理审查信息管理系统应用使审查管理工作科学、高效,提升伦理审查质量,为医学科学事业的健康发展提供保障。 Objective Discussing the approach to design and implementation of ethical review information management system in clinical research involving human subject. Methods Systematic design and implementation based on ICH-GCP, Chinese GCP, Ethical review of biomedical research in- volving human subjects, Standard Operating Procedure compliant with Asia Pacific SIDCER certifica- tion standards, as well as the working experiences of author group. Results According to the specific working procedures in Beijing e-plugger Support Technology Co. Ltd, We implement ethical manage- ment system with real-time online interactive work model among investigators, ethical committee sec- retariat and ethical reviewers, which is prepared for further system optimization and upgrade. Conclu- sions The application of ethical review information management system make the ethical management work more reliable, efficient, and also improve the quality of ethical review, which helps a lot in safe- guarding the development of medical science.
出处 《中华医学科研管理杂志》 2017年第6期473-476,共4页 Chinese Journal of Medical Science Research Management
关键词 临床研究 伦理审查 信息管理系统 Clinical research Ethical review Management information system
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献60

  • 1奚益群,樊民胜,唐燕.从医务人员对医学伦理的了解看医学伦理教育[J].中国医学伦理学,2005,18(1):49-52. 被引量:24
  • 2田冬霞,张金钟.美国机构伦理审查委员会认证体系的启示[J].中国医学伦理学,2006,19(4):15-19. 被引量:30
  • 3中华人民共和国卫生部.涉及人的生物医学研究伦理审查办法(试行)[S].北京:中华人民共和国卫生部,2007.
  • 4国家食品药品监督管理局.药物临床试验质量管理规范[s].2003.
  • 5国家食品药品监督管理局.药物临床试验伦理审查工作指导原则(2010年)[EB/OL].(2010-11-2)[2011-01-21].http://www.sfda.gov.cn/WS01/CL0058/55613.html.
  • 6刘激扬,田勇泉.提高生命科学研究中的伦理审查质量的思考[J].医学与哲学(A),2007,28(12):8-9. 被引量:9
  • 7World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration oI Helsinki Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects[J . JAMA, 2013,310(27) :2191--2194.
  • 8Office of Inspector General,Department of Health and Human Services. Institutional Review Boards A Time for Reform[R]. Washington Department of Health and Human Services, 1998.
  • 9Office for Human Research Protections. Guidance on IRB Continuing Review of Researeh[EB/OL]. (2010--11--10)[2014--01 10]. http:// www. hhs. gov/ohrp/policy/continuingreview2010, htrnl.
  • 10Duke University Health System Institutional Review Board. Determining Frequency of Continuing Review[EB/OL]. [2014 01-10]. http:// irb. dubs. duke. edu/modules/irb_pols/index, php? id=3.

共引文献81

同被引文献103

引证文献13

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部