攀岩与抗阻力训练男性上半身力量的比较分析

A Comparative Analysis of Men's Upper Body Strength in Climbing and Resistance Training

目的:比较分析了攀岩(RC)与抗阻力训练(RT)男性之间的上半身力量的异同,为不同的运动项目特点和要求,提供科学合理的指导训练。对象和方法:分别选取了攀岩(RC)与抗阻力训练(RT)男性各15名共30名志愿者进行身体脂肪百分比测量和最大强度的引体向上、俯卧撑、手指力量、捏力、握力测试。结果与结论:(1)RT和RC在年龄、体重上存在显著性差异,P<0.05;(2)RC引体向上测试个数(19.31±4.31)比RT(15.64±4.82)更多,二者差异显著,P<0.05;(3)RC(R:0.27±0.10;L:0.24±0.07)具有比RT(R:0.19±0.04;L:0.16±0.05)更大的相对捏力和相对较大的握力(R:0.70±0.10;L:0.65±0.12);(R:0.57±0.14;L:0.56±0.15)。总体来说,RC和RT存在以上差异,主要是与它们项目特点差异有很大关系。RC比RT的上半身力量要更好,即使在没有传统的抗阻力训练下,攀岩训练也可以促进和增强上半身力量。

The purpose of this study is compareing the simi- larities and differences between the upper body strength be- tween the RC and the anti-resistance training（RT） ,and pro- vides scientific and reasonable guidance training for different sports characteristics and requirements. Subjects and meth- ods ：Each group of 15 volunteers,who were selected for rock climbing （RC） and resistance training （ RT）,were selected for body fat percentage and maximal force in the top,push-ups, finger strength, test. The results and conclusions showed that：（ 1 ）There were significant differences in age and body weight between RT and RC （P 〈 0. 05 ）. （2）The number of RC priming（19. 31 ±4. 31）was higher than that of RT（15. 64 ±4. 82） （ R：0. 27± 0. 10 ; L：0. 24 ± 0. 07 ） was higher than that of RT（R：0. 19 ±0. 04;L：0. 16） ,and the difference was significant（P 〈0.05） （R：0.70 ± 0. 10;L：0.65 ± 0. 12）; （R：0. 57±0. 14;L：＆ lt;RTI ID =0.0 ＆ gt;0. 56 ±0. 15 ）. In general, RC and RT there are the above differences;main- ly with their differences in the characteristics of the project has a great relationship. RC is better than RT＇s upper body strength ,even in the absence of traditional resistance train- ing ;rock climbing training can also promote and enhance the upper body strength.