“缺席”的“在场”——再论瞿秋白与“左联”第二次文艺大众化讨论

“Presence” of “Absence”: A e-discussion on the Second Popularization of Literature and Art between Qu Qiubai and Chinese Leftists Writers' League(CLWL)

相对于众多的大众化版本,瞿秋白的文艺大众化始终注目着"用什么话写"的方向。考察他的生平和经历,这其实是他清理汉字拉丁化理论地基的产物,身怀旨在文字改革的内在诉求。在他为第二次文艺大众化讨论撰写的理论文章里,汉字拉丁化的色彩越来越浓烈,越来越高蹈,遭到"左联"内部的诸多抵制,最终成为"缺席"的"在场"。

As opposed to many popular versions,Qu Qiubai's popularization of literature and art has always been focused on " what words to be written". Investigating his life and experiences,it is actually the product of his efforts to clean up the foundation of the latinization of Chinese characters and embraces the internal appeal of language reform. In his theoretical essay written for the second popularization of literature and art,the latinization of Chinese characters became more and more intense,more and more uprising. But it was boycotted by CLWL and eventually became the " Presence" of " Absence".