期刊文献+

不同浓度耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌制备慢性骨髓炎模型对比研究 被引量:2

Comparative study of different concentrations of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the preparation of chronic femoral osteomyelitis models
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨采用耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus,MRSA)建立兔股骨慢性骨髓炎模型的合适浓度。方法取成年新西兰大白兔48只随机分为6组,每组8只,B、C、D、E、F组分别于股骨髁上2 cm处注射1×10~9、1×10~8、1×10~7、1×10~6、1×10~5 CFU/m L MRSA,A组注射无菌生理盐水作为对照。术后4周行实验动物大体观察,取伤口分泌物行细菌学检查;术前及术后2、4周检测血清C反应蛋白含量;术后4周行X线片及CT检查并行Norden影像学评分;术后4周处死动物取材后行标本大体观察及评分,并行HE染色观察及组织学评分。结果 B组因感染严重死亡5只动物,C组死亡2只,D、E、F组均无动物死亡。大体观察A组切口愈合良好,无软组织肿胀;B~D组大部分可见切口红肿及窦道形成,股骨增粗,骨质破坏,破坏程度随浓度降低而降低;E、F组切口可见感染征象,感染程度不及D组。细菌学观察示B、C、D、E组切口窦道形成动物均培养出阳性结果,随着浓度降低,切口窦道形成动物数目逐渐降低;F组无窦道形成遂未做细菌学培养。术前各组间C反应蛋白含量差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后2、4周B~F组C反应蛋白含量均显著高于A组(P<0.05);术后4周C反应蛋白含量B组>C组>D组>E组>F组>A组,各组间比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。影像学检测示A组无软组织肿胀及骨质破坏;B、C组可见骨质破坏,大量死骨形成,软组织肿胀严重;D、E组可见骨质破坏,死骨形成程度不及C组;F组可见少量骨感染。B~F组Norden评分显著高于A组,B、C组显著高于D、E、F组,D、E组显著高于F组(P<0.05);B、C组间及D、E组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。B~F组标本大体观察评分显著高于A组,B、C组显著高于D、E、F组(P<0.05);D、E、F组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。HE染色示A组骨小梁结构清晰,结构排列整齐;B~F组可见骨小梁破坏,炎性细胞浸润且程度逐渐降低。B~F组组织学评分显著高于A组,B组显著高于C~F组,C、D组显著高于F组(P<0.05);C、D、E组间以及E、F组间比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论采用MRSA制备兔股骨慢性骨髓炎模型的最佳菌液浓度为1×10~6~1×10~7 CFU/m L。 ObjectiveTo investigate the appropriate concentration of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in establishing chronic femoral osteomyelitis model in rabbits.MethodsForty-eight adult New Zealand white rabbits were randomly divided into 6 groups with 8 rabbits in each group. Animals in groups B, C, D, E, and F were injected 1×109, 1×108, 1×107, 1×106, 1×105 CFU/mL MRSA on the location of 2 cm of the femoral supracondyle, respectively, and group A was injected with aseptic saline as a control. The general observation were performed at 4 weeks after operation, and the wound secretions were taken for bacteriological examination. The serum C-reactive protein content was detected at preoperation and 2 weeks and 4 weeks after operation. The X-ray, CT scan, and Norden imaging scoring were performed at 4 weeks after operation. At 4 weeks after operation, the animals were sacrificed, and the specimens were observed and evaluated by general scores; and the HE staining and histological score were also performed.ResultsFive rabbits died of severe infection in group B, 2 died in group C, and no rabbit died in groups D, E, and F. General observation showed that the incision healed without soft tissue swelling in group A; most animals had visible incision swelling and sinus formation, femoral thickening, bone destruction, and damage decreased with the decreasing of the concentration of liquid bacterial in groups B-D; the infection signs were seen in groups E and F, and the degree of infection were less than that of group D. Bacteriological examination showed that fistula formation animal in groups B, C, D, and E were cultured with positive results, and with the decrease of concentration, the number of animal fistula formation decreased gradually; and bacteriological culture did not be performed in group F because of no sinus formation. There was no significant difference in the content of C-reactive protein between groups before operation (P〉0.05). The contents of C-reactive protein in groups B-F were significantly higher than those in group A at 2 and 4 weeks after operation (P〈0.05). At 4 weeks after operation, the content of C-reactive protein was in the order of groups B, C, D, E, F, and A in turn from high to low, showing significant differences between groups (P〈0.05). Imaging examination showed that there was no soft tissue swelling and bone destruction in group A; bone destruction, massive sequestrum formation, and soft tissue swelling were found in groups B and C; bone destruction was observed in groups D and E, and the degree of sequestrum formation was not as good as that in group C; and there was a small amount of bone infection in group F. The Norden scores in groups B-F were significantly higher than that in group A, and in groups B and C than those in groups D, E, and F, and in groups D and E than that in group F (P〈0.05); there was no significant difference between groups B and C, and between groups D and E (P〉0.05). The specimens general observation scores in groups B-F were significantly higher than that in group A, while in groups B and C than those in groups D, E, and F (P〈0.05); there was no significant difference between groups D, E, and F (P〉0.05). HE staining showed that the structure of bone trabecula in group A was clear and the structure was arranged neatly; in groups B-F, trabecular bone destruction and inflammatory cell infiltration were seen and the degree gradually decreased. The histological scores in groups B-F were significantly higher than that in group A, and in group B than those in groups C-F, in groups C and D than that in group F (P〈0.05); there was no significant difference between groups C, D, and E, and between groups E and F (P〉0.05).ConclusionThe optimal MRSA concentration of rabbit model of chronic osteomyelitis of femur is between 1×106 and 1×107 CFU/mL.
出处 《中国修复重建外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第4期412-419,共8页 Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(81371983)~~
关键词 慢性骨髓炎 耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌 动物模型 Chronic osteomyelitis methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus animal model rabbit
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献30

  • 1Schulz S, Steinhart H, Mutters R. Chronic osteomyelitis in a new rabbit model[ J].J Invest Surg,2001,2 : 121 - 131.
  • 2An YH, Kang QK, Arciola CR. Animal models of osteomyelitis[ J]. hat J Artif Organs,2006,4:407 - 420.
  • 3陈卫,丁真奇.感染性骨缺损的治疗及研究进展[J].临床骨科杂志,2007,10(5):461-463. 被引量:12
  • 4Winters R,Tatum SA 3rd. Chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;22(4):332-335.
  • 5Conterno LO, da Silva Filho CR. Antibiotics for treating chronic osteomyelitis in adults.Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;(3): CD004439.
  • 6Jae J J, He SL, Young RC, et al. Surgical treatment of non -diabetic chronic osteomyelitis involving the foot and ankle. Foot & Anklelnter.2012;33(2): 128-132.
  • 7Roderick MR, Ramanan AV. Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis. Adv Exp Med Bio1.2013;764:99-107.
  • 8Marais LC, Ferreira N. Bone transport through an induced membrane in the management of tibial bone defects resulting from chronic osteomyelitis. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2015; 10(1 ):27-33.
  • 9Spellberg B, Lipsky BA. Systemic antibiotic therapy for chronic osteomyelitis in adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54(3): 393-407.
  • 10Panteli M,Puttaswamaiah R,Lowenberg DW,et al.Malignant Transformationbin Chronic Osteomyelitis: Recognition and Principles of Management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014; 22(9):586-594.

共引文献27

同被引文献15

引证文献2

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部