期刊文献+

基于交叉效率和合作博弈的决策单元排序方法 被引量:21

Ranking Decision Making Units Based on Cross-efficiency and Cooperative Game
原文传递
导出
摘要 在数据包络分析中,大量的交叉效率模型已被提出。然而选择不同的目标模型将实现不一样的交叉效率评价。本文基于针对单个决策单元实施的对抗型和仁慈型两个交叉效率模型,用合作博弈方法来研究交叉效率模型的选取,并利用Shapley值对决策单元进行排序。最后通过实例分析显示该排序方法充分利用了最小交叉效率和最大交叉效率的信息完全排序了所有决策单元,具有一定的综合性和合理性。 In data envelopment analysis(DEA),the cross-efficiency evaluation is an effective method for ranking decision making units(DMUs),which is performed with peer-evaluation and self-evaluation.From different points of view,various secondary goals have been proposed such as the aggressive model and the benevolent model.Yet different secondary goal models lead to different cross-efficiency evaluation.In this paper,the cooperative game theory is used to choose the secondary goal model between the targeted aggressive model and the targeted benevolent model and then evaluate all DMUs.Specifically,it is assumed that a cooperative game is developed among all DMUs.Given a coalition of some DMUs,a DMU in this coalition will make the best appraisal of each DMU in the same coalition based on the targeted benevolent model,and choose the targeted aggressive model to evaluate the other DMUs which do not belong to the coalition.Further,each DMU is evaluated with its Shapley value in the cooperative game.Finally,an example is presented to show that the proposed method can make full use of the minimum crossefficiency and the maximum cross-efficiency and it is a comprehensive,fair and reasonable ranking method.
作者 刘文丽 王应明 吕书龙 LIU Wen-li;WANG Ying-ming;LV Shu-long(School of Economics and Management, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350116, China;School of Mathematics and Computer Science, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350116, China)
出处 《中国管理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2018年第4期163-170,共8页 Chinese Journal of Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71371053) 教育部高教司产学合作协同育人项目(201702057021,201702057007) 福建省本科高校教育教学改革研究项目(FBJG20170021)
关键词 数据包络分析(DEA) 交叉效率 合作博弈 SHAPLEY值 data envelopment analysis (DEA) cross-efficiency cooperative games Shapley value
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献38

  • 1吴杰,梁樑.交叉效率评价方法中新单元导入的保序性[J].系统工程,2006,24(7):111-115. 被引量:16
  • 2刘业政,徐德鹏,姜元春.多属性群决策中权重自适应调整的方法[J].系统工程与电子技术,2007,29(1):45-48. 被引量:49
  • 3Chames A, Cooper W W, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units [ J ]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1978,2(6) : 429 - 444.
  • 4Zilla S S,Lea F. Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context [ J ]. European Journal of Operational Research,2002,140(2) :249 - 256.
  • 5Doyle J, Green R, Cook W D. Preference voting and project ranking using DEA and cross evaluation[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1996,90(3) : 461 - 472.
  • 6Sexton T R, Silkman R H, Hogan A J. Data Envelopment Analysis: Critique and Extensions[ M]. In: Silkman R H(Ed. ), Measuring Efficiency: An Assessment of Data Envelgpment Analysis, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1986.
  • 7TaUuri S,Yoon K P. A cone-ratio DEA approach for AMT justification[J] .International Journal of Production Economics,2000,66 (2) : 119- 129.
  • 8Shang J,Sueyoshi T. A unified framework for the selection of a flexible manufacturing system[J] .European Journal of Operational Research, 1995,85(2) : 297 - 315.
  • 9Oral M, Kettani O, Lang P. A methodology for collective evaluation and selection of industrial R&D projects [ J ]. Management Science, 1991,37(7) : 871 - 885.
  • 10Despoils D K. Improving the discriminating power of DEA: Focus on globally efficient units[J] .Journal of the Operational Research Society,2002,53(3) : 314 - 323.

共引文献39

同被引文献167

引证文献21

二级引证文献48

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部