期刊文献+

SYNTAX评分与FFR在临界病变中的相关性研究 被引量:1

Relevant Research of the SNYTAX Score and FFR in Critical Lesions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析在冠脉临界病变中SYNTAX评分与血流储备分数(fractional flow reserve,FFR)有无相关性。方法105例冠脉造影检查提示处于临界病变的患者,按SYNTAX评分根据病变血管数目的不同,分为一支血管病变组A组23例、两支血管病变组B组32例和三支血管病变组C组50例;再根据FFR检测结果,把每一组分为≤0.75(1)组、>0.75且≤0.8(2)组和>0.80(3)组三个亚组。采用EXCEL和SPSS20.0处理软件分析相关性。结果 A组中两个亚组之间无相关性。B组和C组中两个亚组之间的P<0.001,具有统计学意义。结论 SYNTAX评分在某些冠脉临界病变中,与FFR检测有一定相关性,可作为FFR检测的部分替代工具。 Objective To analyze the correlation between SYNTAX score and fractional flow reserve( FFR) in coronary critical lesion.Methods According to the number of diseased vessels by SYNTAX score,105 cases of patients with critical lesion revealed by coronary angiography were divided into three groups: group A of one diseased vessel( n = 23),group B of two diseased vessels( n = 32),and group C of three diseased vessels( n = 50); According to the results of FFR test,each group was divided into three subgroups: group(1)≤0. 75,group(2) 0. 75 and ≤0. 82 and group(3) 0. 80.EXCEL and SPSS20. 0 were used to analyze the correlation.Results There was no correlation between the two subgroups in group A. The P values between the two subgroups in group B and group C were all 0. 001,which was statistically significant. Conclusion SYNTAX score is correlated with FFR in some critical lesions of coronary artery and can be used as a substitute for FFR detection.
作者 叶滔 夏茏 熊波 丁寻实 周名纲 陈应忠 蔡琳 Ye Tao;Xia Long;Xiong Bo;et al(South- west Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan 646000;The Third People's Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu Cardiovascular Disease Re- search Institute, Chengdu , Sichuan 610031, China)
出处 《四川医学》 CAS 2018年第4期412-415,共4页 Sichuan Medical Journal
关键词 SYNTAX评分 血流储备分数 冠脉临界病变 SYNTAX score fractional flow reserve coronary- critical lesion
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献26

  • 1Pijls NH,Fearon WF,Tonino PA,et al.Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Guiding Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease-2-Year Follow-Up of the FAME Study[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2010,56(3):177-184.
  • 2Kushner FG,Hand M, Smith SC Jr,et al.2009 Focused Updates:ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and ACC/AHA/SCAI Guidelines on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2009,54(23):2205-2241.
  • 3Wijns W,Kolh P,Danchin N, et al. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)[J].Eur Heart J,2010,31(20):2501-2555.
  • 4Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery ( EACTS ), European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), Wijns W, et al. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J,2010 , 31:2501-2555.
  • 5Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/ SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines and the society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions. Circulation, 2011, 124 :e574-651.
  • 6Hillis LD, Smith PK, Anderson JL, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines, developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2011,58 :e123-210.
  • 7Nashef SA, Roques F, Michel P, et al. European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation ( EuroSCORE ). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 1999,16:9-13.
  • 8Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med, 2009,360:961- 972.
  • 9Peterson ED, Dai D, DeLong ER, et al. Contemporary mortality risk prediction for percutaneous coronary intervention: results from 588,398 procedures in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. J Am Coil Cardiol,2010,55:1923-1932.
  • 10Online STS fish calculator [ S/OL]. [ 2012-01-01 ]. http:// riskcalc, sts. org/STSWebRiskCalc273/de, aspx.

共引文献434

同被引文献2

引证文献1

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部