期刊文献+

中文版10条目心理韧性量表在恶性肿瘤患者中的应用研究 被引量:53

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale in Chinese Cancer Patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨中文版10条目心理韧性量表(CD-RISC-10)在恶性肿瘤患者中的信效度。方法采用便利抽样法选取2015年12月—2016年7月于广州中医药大学第一附属医院、中山大学肿瘤防治中心、广东省中医院接受治疗的恶性肿瘤患者520例为调查对象,采用一般资料表、中文版CD-RISC-10、医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)、癌症患者自我管理效能感量表(SUPPH)对其进行调查。共发放问卷520份,回收有效问卷424份,有效回收率为81.5%。大样本施测2周后,采用EXCEL软件自带的随机程序从424例患者中选取50例采用中文版CD-RISC-10对其进行重测。采用双参数项目反应模型对中文版CD-RISC-10进行单维性检验、等级反应模型(GRM)条目分析,并分析其聚合效度、重测信度及截断值。结果中文版CD-RISC-10仍保持单维结构,共解释58.06%的变异量,整个量表条目分离指数(ISI)为0.914。10个条目难度分布均匀,区分度为1.17~1.82,残差拟合度为-2.5~2.5,阈值间距为1.08~3.17 logits,不存在阈值倒错的情况。中文版CD-RISC-10得分与HADS总分及其焦虑、抑郁得分呈负相关,与SUPPH总分及其各维度得分呈正相关(P<0.05)。中文版CD-RISC-10的重测信度系数为0.855,截断值为21.5分,灵敏度为0.735,特异度为0.833。结论中文版CD-RISC-10的单维性、单调性良好,条目的难度、阈值间距分布合理,同时具有较高的信度和外标效度,对于筛查情绪困扰的恶性肿瘤患者具有较高的敏感性,建议临床使用。 Objective This study was designed to examine the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale(CD-RISC-10) in a sample of Chinese patients with cancer.Methods This study was conducted between December 2015 and July 2016.The psychometric properties of Chinese version of CD-RISC-10 were tested in a randomly selected sample of 520 cancer cases from the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine,Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center and Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine.The participants were also surveyed by other 2 scales[Chinese version of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale(HADS) and Chinese version of Strategies Used by People to Promote Health(SUPPH)] to test their associations with the CD-RISC-10 and get the cut-off point of the CD-RISC-10.424(81.5%) responded to the survey positively,and 50 of them were randomly selected based on a Microsoft Excel-based algorithm and were resurveyed by the Chinese version of CD-RISC-10 two weeks later.The unidimensionality for the Chinese version of CD-RISC-10 was investigated by a two-parameter item response analysis,item analysis was performed using GRM.Furthermore,its convergent validity and retest reliability and cut-off point were analyzed.Results The Chinese version of CD-RISC-10 retained its original undimensional structure,which could explain 58.06% of the total variance.The item separation index(ISI) was 0.914.The item difficulty was ideally normal,discrimination ability ranged from 1.17 to 1.82 and fit residual value of every item was within the range of-2.5-2.5.There existed no disordered threshold among all the items and the step of thresholds varied from 1.08 to 3.17 logits.The Chinese version of CD-RISC-10 was negatively associated with the Chinese version of HADS and its anxiety and depression subscales but positively associated with the Chinese version of SUPPH and its subscales in terms of scoring(P〈0.05).The retest reliability coefficient,cut-off point,sensitivity and specificity for the Chinese version of CD-RISC-10 was 0.855,21.5,0.735,0.833,respectively.Conclusion The Chinese version of CD-RISC-10 has a stable undimensional structure with good monotonicity,ideally normal item difficulty,reasonable distribution of step of thresholds,as well as good reliability and external validity,so it is suitable to be adapted in clinical settings for assessing the psychological status of Chinese cancer patients.
作者 叶增杰 王桢钰 梁木子 Knobf Tish Dixon Jane 佘颖 胡蕖 曾珍 胡光云 朱云飞 邱鸿钟 YE Zeng-jie;WANG Zhen-yu;LIANG Mu-zi;Knobf Tish;Dixon Jane;SHE Ying;HU Qu;ZENG Zhen;HU Guang-yun;ZHU Yun-fei;QIU Hong-zhong(Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine,Guangzhou 510405,China;Guangdong Academy of Population Development,Guangzhou 510600,China;Yale University,New Haven 06520,America;Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center,Guangzhou 510060,China)
出处 《中国全科医学》 CAS 北大核心 2018年第15期1839-1844,共6页 Chinese General Practice
基金 广州中医药大学2016年校创新科研团队培育项目(2016KYTD08) 国家留学基金资助项目(留金发[2016]3100号) 广州中医药大学优秀博士论文培育项目(20152108112)
关键词 肿瘤 韧性 心理 项目反应理论 信度 效度 截断值 Neoplasms Resilience psychological Item response theory Reliability Validity Cut-off
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献23

  • 1蒋艳 ,沈宁 ,邹树芳 .护理研究中量表研制及测量学特征的评定方法[J].中华护理教育,2005,2(4):174-176. 被引量:82
  • 2吴明隆.SPSS统计应用实务[M]科学出版社,2003.
  • 3Elise L. Lev,Lucille Sanzero Eller,John Kolassa,Glen Gejerman,Joan Colella,Patricia Lane,Suzanne Scrofine,Michael Esposito,Vincent Lanteri,John Scheuch,Ravi Munver,Bernadette Galli,Richard A. Watson,Ihor Sawczuk.Exploratory factor analysis: strategies used by patients to promote health[J]. World Journal of Urology . 2007 (1)
  • 4Sharon L. Manne Ph.D.,Jamie S. Ostroff Ph.D.,Tina R. Norton Ph.D.,Kevin Fox M.D.,Generosa Grana M.D.,Lori Goldstein M.D..Cancer-specific self-efficacy and psychosocial and functional adaptation to early stage breast cancer[J]. Annals of Behavioral Medicine . 2006 (2)
  • 5Department of Health.National Cancer Survivorship Initiative vision. http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publi-cations/Publications PolicyAndGuidance/DH_111230 . 2009
  • 6Wu HK,Chau JP,Twinn S.Self-efficacy and quality of life among stomapatients in Hong Kong. Cancer Nursing . 2007
  • 7Macmillan Cancer Support.Self-management programmes for cancersurvivors:a structured reviw of outcome. http://www.ncsi.org.uk/supported-self-management/ . 2009
  • 8Akin S,Can G,Durna Z,et al.Preliminary testing of a Turkish versionof the Strategies Used by Patients to Promote Health(SUPPH)Scale ina sample of breast cancer patients. J Nurs Healthcare Chronic Illness . 2009
  • 9Lev EL,Owen SV.A measure of self-care self-efficacy. Research in Nursing and Health . 1996
  • 10Owen SV,Lev EL.Confirmatory factor evidence for the SUPPH. Proceedings of the 13th Annual Scientific Sessions of the EasternNursing Research Society . 2001

共引文献539

同被引文献584

引证文献53

二级引证文献236

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部