期刊文献+

灾害天气下高速公路风险评估的Logit模型改进 被引量:3

Improved Logit Model of Risk Assessment for Freeway in Disaster Weather
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Logit模型使用时要求自变量数量少、相互独立.灾害天气下高速公路风险评估的自变量种类和数量较多,变量之间存在相关性.因此,利用主成分分析将多个相关的自变量转化为少数、相互独立且包含绝大部分原始信息的新自变量,避免自变量共线性对Logit模型的影响.主成分分析表明,风险分析自变量相关性较强,不能直接使用Logit建模;主成分依次为:天气、交通流、交通标志,灾害天气的等级和持续时间是最主要变量,二者负相关,交通量与车型比例正相关,标志的清晰度和可视性正相关.Logit模型表明,天气、交通流与风险等级正相关,标志标线与风险等级负相关.实测数据证明改进模型比Logit模型评估精度更高;风险等级越高时,改进模型评估精度越高. When the logit model is used,the number of independent variables should be limited and independent.In disaster weather,there are many kinds and quantities of independent variables in highway risk assessment,and there are correlations among variables.Therefore,using principal component analysis,a number of related independent variables were transformed into a few new mutual independent variables containing most of the original information,to avoid the influence of collinearity of independent variables on the logit model.Principal component analysis shows that the independent variable of risk analysis is relatively strong and cannot be modeled directly by logit model.The main components include the weather,traffic flow and traffic marking.The level and duration of disaster weather are the most important variables,which present the negative correlation.The traffic volume is positively related to vehicle type,and the clarity and the visibility of the marking present the positive correlation.The logit model shows that the weather and traffic flow are positively related to the risk level,and the marking is negatively related to the risk level.The measured data show that the improved model is more accurate than the logit model.The higher the risk level is,the higher the prediction accuracy of the improved model is.
作者 李素兰 张谢东 李红伟 孙琳 LI Sulan;ZHANG Xiedong;LI Hongwei;SUN Lin(School of Transportation,Wuhan University of Technology,Wuhan 430063,China;Wuhan Bridge Maintenance Management Office,Wuhan 430015,China;College of Civil and Transportation Engineering,Hohai University,Nanjing 210098,China;Wuhan Transportation Science Research Institute,Wuhan 430015,China)
出处 《武汉理工大学学报(交通科学与工程版)》 2018年第3期412-416,共5页 Journal of Wuhan University of Technology(Transportation Science & Engineering)
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71501061) 江苏省自然科学基金项目(BK20150821) 湖北省交通运输厅科技项目(2016-13-1-3 2017-538-3-3)资助
关键词 交通工程 风险评估 主成分分析 LOGIT模型 traffic engineering risk assessment principal component analysis logit model
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献33

  • 1吴贤国,王锋.R=P×C法评价水下盾构隧道施工风险[J].华中科技大学学报(城市科学版),2005,22(4):44-46. 被引量:40
  • 2黄宏伟.隧道及地下工程建设中的风险管理研究进展[J].地下空间与工程学报,2006,2(1):13-20. 被引量:256
  • 3陈龙,黄宏伟.软土盾构隧道施工期风险损失分析[J].地下空间与工程学报,2006,2(1):74-78. 被引量:33
  • 4同济大学.肇兴隧道工程建设安全风险评估[R].上海:同济大学,2008.
  • 5地铁及地下工程建设风险管理指南[R].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2007.
  • 6[1]Gregory B,Baecher,John T,Christian.Reliability and statistics in geotechnical engineering[M].John Wiley & Sons Ltd.,England,2003.
  • 7ESKESEN S D, TENGBORG P R, KAMPMANN J, et al. Guidelines for tunnelling risk management: international tunneling association, working group No. 2 [ J]. Tunneling and Underground Space technology, 2004, 19 (3): 217- 237.
  • 8EINSTEIN H H, CHIAVERIO F, KOPPEL U. Risk analysis for the Adler tunnel [ J]. Tunnels &Tunneling, 1994, 26(11): 28-30.
  • 9EINSTEIN H H. Risk and risk analysis in rock engineering [ J ]. Tunneling and Underground Space Technology, 1996, 11(2): 141-155.
  • 10EINSTEIN H H, INDERMIUE C, SINFIELD J, et al. Decision aids for tunneling[ C]//, 1996: 6-9.

共引文献86

同被引文献24

引证文献3

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部