期刊文献+

股东同质化假设与异质化现实——基于股东身份和企业性质两个视角

The Assumption of Shareholder Homogenization and The Reality of Shareholder Heterogeneity——Based on the Identify of Shareholders and Enterprises
下载PDF
导出
摘要 股东同质化假设下的"一股一票"制度在理论和实践中已饱受质疑,股东异质化作为一种新的替代选择,其赋予了企业在股权结构选择上更多的自由,妥善处理了控制权与所有权的均衡关系,满足了不同企业和不同股东的现实需要。然而我国《公司法》依然固守同股同权的传统,这种观念必须更新,应根据现实对新的制度体系进行引进和发展。 The assumption of shareholder homogeneity of the "one share one vote" system has been questioned in theory and practice, shareholder heterogeneity as a new alternative, more freedom in the choice of ownership structure , it handles the balance of control meet the different needs of different enterprises and different shareholders. In China, the homogeneity of shareholders and the "one share one vote" tradition, this concept What's more, all of these should be based on the reality gives enterprls and ownership we still must be es to sticks to updated.
作者 殷彤 Yin Tong(Shandong Administration for Industry and Commerce,Shandong Jinan 250100)
出处 《上海市经济管理干部学院学报》 2018年第4期32-40,共9页 Journal of Shanghai Economic Management College
基金 国家社科基金青年项目"普惠金融视角下银行商业特许经营模式法律问题研究"(16CFX047)的阶段性成果
关键词 股东同质化 股东异质化 同股同权 shareholder homogenization shareholder heterogeneity one share one vote
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献121

  • 1朱慈蕴.资本多数决原则与控制股东的诚信义务[J].法学研究,2004,26(4):104-116. 被引量:218
  • 2赵万一,胡军.论公司收购中控股股东的诚信义务[J].郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,38(1):52-55. 被引量:5
  • 3Stephen A. Ross. The Economic Theory of Agency : The Principal' s Problem [ J ]. American Economic Association, Vol. 63, 1973: 134.
  • 4M. C. Jensen, W. Meckling. Theory of the Firm:Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost and Ownership Structure [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3, 1976:305 - 360.
  • 5Margaret M. Blair, Lynn A. Stout. A Team Production Theory of Corporate Law [ J ]. Virginia Law Review, Vol. 85, 1999:248 - 249.
  • 6亚当·斯密.国民财富的性质和原因的研究:下册[M].郭大力,王亚南,译.北京:商务印书馆,1997:303.
  • 7Frank H. Easterbrook, Daniel R. Fischel. Voting in Corporate Law[J]. The Journal of Law & Economics, Vol. 26, 1983 : 405.
  • 8Guhan Subramanian. The Influence of Antitakeover Statutes on Incorporation Choice: Evidence on the "Race" Debate and Antitakeover Overreaching [ J ]. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 150, 2002: 1798.
  • 9Paul H. Edelman, Randall S. Thomas. Corporate Voting and the Takeover Debate [ J ]. Vanderbih Law Review, Vol. 58, 2005: 463.
  • 10Roberta Romano. The Political Economy of Takeover Statutes [J]. Virginia Law Review, Vol. 73, 1987 : 113.

共引文献698

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部