“侵犯公民个人信息罪”司法解释之局限性及其破解

On Limitation of the Judicial Interpretation of “The Crime of Infringement of Citizens' Personal Information”

最高人民法院和最高人民检察院联合发布的《关于办理侵犯公民个人信息刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》集中应对刑法修正案中关于"侵犯公民个人信息罪"规定的模糊和不足,但是《解释》在重点保护行踪轨迹信息、具体解读"国家有关规定"以及明确定罪量刑方面依然存在着无法克服的局限性。受制于个人信息前置保护法律缺乏以及大数据时代变化,《解释》的局限性必然存在,只有通过个人信息利用秩序的整体建构、发挥民事信任法作用以及承认并推进判例制,才能真正突破《解释》的局限性,发挥刑法保护个人信息的有效作用。

The interpretation of several issues concerning the application of the law for the infringement of criminal cases of citizens＇ personal information issued jointly by the supreme people＇s court and the supreme people＇s procuratorate,which focused on the fuzzy and the insufficiency of the crime of violating the citizen＇s personal information in the amendment of the criminal law.However,the＂interpretation＂still has some limitations in the protection of the trail information,the specific interpretation of＂relevant state regulations＂ and the explicit conviction and sentencing.Due to the lack of legal protection of personal information and the change of big data era,the limitation of interpretation must exist.Only through personal information order construction,giving play to the role of civil trust law and recognizing and promoting the precedent system,can we break through the limitations of＂ interpretation＂,bring into the function of criminal law protection of personal information effectively.