期刊文献+

权力稳定性对人性化知觉的影响 被引量:3

The Effect of Stability of Power on Humanization
下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究通过两项实验考察了权力稳定性对自我和他人人性化知觉模式的影响。实验结果发现:(1)在权力稳定条件下,相对于低权力者,高权力者对特指他人和泛指他人均表现出显著的"物品化"和"动物化"知觉倾向,但在权力不稳定条件下,该类知觉倾向均被消解;(2)在权力稳定条件下,相对于特指他人和泛指他人,低权力者对自我表现出"动物化"知觉倾向,但在权力不稳定条件下,该知觉倾向被消解。因此,权力的可变性有助于消除个体的去人性化倾向。 In the current study,two experiments were adopted to investigate the influence of stability of power on self-and others-humanization(including both human nature and human uniqueness towards self,specialized-others,and generalized-others).The results are as follows:(1)when individuals hold stable power,compared with low-power ones,high-power ones show more animalistic and objectification forms of dehumanization towards specialized-and generalized-others,while those with unstable power do not exhibit any observed difference;(2)under the stable-power condition,individuals with low power are revealed to be a larger degree of animalistic dehumanization towards self than both specialized-and generalized-others,while such an effect was diminished under the unstable-power condition.Taken together,the variability of power could help eliminate individual’s dehumanization.
作者 李文洁 周艳艳 蒋赛 孙忠强 张锋 LI Wen-jie;ZHOU Yan-yan;JIANG Sai;SUN Zhong-qiang;ZHANG Feng(Department of Psychology,Ningbo University,Ningbo 315211,China;Taizhou Vocational&Technical College,Taizhou 318000,China)
出处 《应用心理学》 CSSCI 2018年第2期141-152,共12页 Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology
基金 教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目(17YJC190023)
关键词 权力地位 权力稳定性 人性化知觉 合作任务 position of power,stability of power,humanization,cooperation task
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献53

  • 1韩文超,叶明,冷玥.中国大陆版人际反应指针量表的修订与检验[J].东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013,15(S1):47-52. 被引量:14
  • 2郭庆科,韩丹,王昭,时勘.人格测验中题目正反向陈述的效应[J].心理学报,2006,38(4):626-632. 被引量:15
  • 3Huttenlocher J, Higgins E T. Adjectives, comparatives, and syllogisms. Psychological Review, 1971, 78:487 - 504.
  • 4Herr P M. Consequences of priming: Judgment and behavior,Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986,51.1106 -1115.
  • 5Jacowitz K E, Kashneman D. Measures of anchoring in estimation tasks. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1995,21 : 1161 -1166.
  • 6Mussweiler T. Comparison Process in Social Judgment: Mechanisms and Consequence. Psychology Review, 2003, 119 : 472 - 489.
  • 7Trope Y, Laberrnan A. Social hypothesis testing: Cognitive and motivational factors. In: Social psychology.. Handbook of basic principles. New York: Gunltord Press. 1996: 239 - 270.
  • 8Sanbonmastsu D M, Posavac S S, Kardes F R, Mantel S P. Selective hypothesis testing, Psychonomlc Bulletin and Review, 1998, 5:197 - 220.
  • 9Smith E E, Shoben E J, Rips L J. Structure and process in semantic memory: A feature model for semantic decisions. Psychology Review, 1974,81:214 - 241.
  • 10Klayman J, Ha Y W. Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing. Psychology Review, 1987, 94 : 211- 228.

共引文献20

同被引文献39

引证文献3

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部