期刊文献+

不同剂量舒芬太尼对胆囊癌手术患者预后的影响 被引量:2

Study on the Efficacy of Different Doses of Sufentanil for Patients with Gallbladder Cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨不同剂量麻醉药物(舒芬太尼)对胆囊癌手术患者预后的影响。方法选取行手术治疗胆囊癌的患者160例作为研究对象,根据术中舒芬太尼用量分为观察组(80例)和对照组(80例)。2组患者均采用静脉途径给药,剂量分别为0.15 g/kg和0.20 g/kg。对2组患者的手术疗效、苏醒时间、并发症以及术后1 h、4 h和12 h的镇痛和镇静评分进行比较。结果 2组患者的总有效率差异无统计学意义(P> 0.05)。观察组的苏醒时间[(10.91±1.94)min]低于对照组[(14.42±2.13) min],差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。观察组术后1 h、4 h、12 h的镇静评分及1 h、4 h的镇痛评分与对照组相比,差异显著(P <0.05);但12 h的镇痛评分与对照组相比,差异无统计学意义(P> 0.05)。观察组术后并发症发生率显著低于对照组(P <0.05)。结论胆囊癌患者术中给予0.15 g/kg的舒芬太尼术后苏醒时间明显较短,镇痛和镇静效果较好,并发症发生率低。 Objective To investigate the prognostic significance of surgical treatment of patients with gallbladder cancer with different doses of anesthetic( sufentanyl).Methods 160 patients who underwent surgery to treat gallbladder cancer during the period were divided into observation group( 80 cases) and control group( 80 cases) according to the sufentanyl dosage.The observation group and control group were given sufentanyl as 0.15 g/kg and 0.20 g/kg through intravenous a Dministration.The efficacy,waking time,complications and analgesic and sedative scores of 1 h,4 h and 12 h were compared between the groups.Results The total efficiency of the two groups was not statistically significant( P > 0.05).The wake time of the observation group( 10.91 ± 1.94) minutes was lower than the control group( 14.42 ± 2.13) minutes,and the difference was statistically significant( P < 0.05);The sedation score of 1 h,4 h and 12 h and the analgesic score of 1 hour and 4 hour of the observation group were significantly different from that of the control group( P < 0.05),the analgesic score of 12 hour showed no statistical significance compared with the control group( P > 0.05).The complication rate of the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group( P < 0.05).Conclusion The postoperative anesthetic effect of patients with gallbladder cancer who given sufentanyl with 0.15 g/kg was significantly better than 0.20 g/kg.
作者 常静 CHANG Jing(Xi'an Electric Power Center Hospital,Xi'an,710032)
出处 《实用癌症杂志》 2019年第1期105-107,共3页 The Practical Journal of Cancer
关键词 胆囊癌 麻醉剂量 舒芬太尼 Gallbladder cancer Anesthesia Sufentanyl
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献56

  • 1周光文,彭承宏,肖卫东,吴伟顶,沈柏用,杨卫平,李宏为.不同类型肝切除术在中晚期胆囊癌治疗中的应用[J].中国实用外科杂志,2005,25(7):411-413. 被引量:5
  • 2刘鲲鹏,廖旭,薛富善.舒芬太尼的药理学和临床应用[J].中国医药导刊,2005,7(6):454-457. 被引量:229
  • 3石景森.腹腔镜意外胆囊癌的处理问题[J].中国微创外科杂志,2006,6(5):323-324. 被引量:9
  • 4侯纯升,徐智,张同琳,彭颖,凌晓锋,王立新,周孝思.浸润深度局限在胆囊壁内的T1和T2期胆囊癌的预后分析[J].中华外科杂志,2006,44(23):1620-1623. 被引量:5
  • 5Hecker B R,Lake C L,DiFazio C A. The decrease of the minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration produced by sufentanil in rats[J].Anesthesia and Analgesia,1983,(11):987-990.
  • 6Chaveron D,Silva S,Sanchez-Verlaan P. The 90% effective dose of a sufentanil bolus for the management of painful positioning in intubated patients in the ICU[J].European Journal of Anaesthesiology,2012,(06):280-285.
  • 7Antunes L M,Roughan J V,Flecknell P A. Evaluation of auditory evoked potentials to predict depth of anaesthesia during fentanyl/flunanisone-midazolam anaesthesia in rat[J].VETERINARY ANAESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA,2001,(04):196-203.
  • 8Alves H C,Valentim A M,Olsson I A. Intraperitoneal propofol and propofol fentanyl,sufentanil and remifentanil combinations for mouse anaesthesia[J].Laboratory Animals,2007,(03):329-336.doi:10.1258/002367707781282767.
  • 9Racine R J. Modification of seizure activity by electric stimulation Ⅱ motor seizure[J].Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology,1972,(03):281-294.
  • 10Hedenqvist P,Roughan J V,Flecknell P A. Sufentanil and medetomidine anaesthesia in the rat and its reversal with atipamezole and butorphanol[J].Laboratory Animals,2000,(03):244-251.doi:10.1258/002367700780384762.

共引文献85

同被引文献16

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部