期刊文献+

两种K_0固结土样的强度比及其各向异性 被引量:5

Normalized Strength and Strength Anisotropy of Two Kinds of K_0 Consolidated Specimens
下载PDF
导出
摘要 K_0固结(侧向约束的固结)可导致土的各向异性.通过对比上海软黏土的原状土样和重塑土样的三轴ACUC(K_0固结压缩剪切)、ACUE(K_0固结拉伸剪切)试验以及直剪试验得到的强度比,研究这两种土样所具有的不同结构对K_0正常固结软黏土强度比及其各向异性的影响.三轴ACUC、ACUE试验中,在3.7倍于结构屈服应力的正常固结范围内,原状土样在不同固结压力下表现出与重塑土样不同的有效应力路径、极限状态线、有效内摩擦角和强度比.当固结压力较小时,原状土样表现出比重塑土样明显偏大的ACUE强度,因而呈现出较小的强度各向异性;随着固结压力的增大及结构进一步破损,原状土样的强度各向异性逐渐增大而接近重塑土.因此,在对K_0正常固结软黏土的三轴强度比及其各向异性的研究中,这种与固结压力相关的结构效应值得关注.直剪快剪试验结果表明,正常固结范围内两种K_0固结土样的强度比几乎相同,因而可以忽略结构效应对直剪快剪强度的影响. K 0 consolidation(confined consotidation) can induce soil anisotropy. To investigate the effects of structures on the normalized undrained strength and strength anisotropy of K 0 normally consolidated soil, triaxial ACUC(K 0 consolidated compression), ACUE(K 0 consolidated extension) tests and direct shear tests were conducted on natural specimens and remolded specimens of Shanghai soft clay. It was found that in the triaxial ACUC and ACUE tests, in the range of consolidation pressure of up to 3.7 times structure yield stress, because of structure effect, the natural specimens have different effective stress paths, ultimate strength line, effective internal friction angle, and normalized strength with the remolded specimens. When consolidation pressure is small, the natural specimens have a larger ACUE strength and therefore, a smaller strength anisotropy than the remolded specimens. With the increase of consolidation pressure and structure damage, the strength anisotropy of natural specimens increases gradually and approaches the strength anisotropy of remolded specimens. Therefore, in the research of the normalized ACUC,ACUE strength, and strength anisotropy of natural soft clay, structure effect should be taken into considered. Moreover, it is found that the two kinds of specimen have almost the same normalized direct shear strength, therefore the effects of structures on direct shear strength can be neglected.
作者 高彦斌 GAO Yanbin(College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)
出处 《同济大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2019年第5期634-639,共6页 Journal of Tongji University:Natural Science
基金 国家自然科学基金(40702051)
关键词 软黏土 结构效应 强度比 三轴试验 强度各向异性 soft soil structure effect normalized strength triaxial test strength anisotropy
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献10

  • 1龚晓南.软粘土地基各向异性初步探讨[J].浙江大学学报,1986,20(4):98-109.
  • 2MitchellJ K,Soga K.Fundamentals of soil behavior[M].[S.l.]John Wiley & Sons,INC,2005.
  • 3Duncan J M,Seed H B.Anisotropy and stress reorientation in clay[J].Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division (ASCE),1966,92(5):21.
  • 4梁令枝.考虑土体固有各向异性的三轴和直剪试验的研究[c]//第19届全国结构工程学术会议论文集(第11册),济南.北京:清华大学出版社,2010:282.285.
  • 5Aas G.Vane tests for investigation of anisotropy of undrained shear strength of clays[C]//Proceedings of Geotechnical Conference.Oslo:[s.n.],1967:3-8.
  • 6Silvestri V,Aubertin M.Anisotropy and in-situ vane tests[C]//Vane Shear Strength Testing in Soils:Field and Laboratory Studies.Philadelphia:ASTM STP 1014,1988:88-103.
  • 7Casagrande A,Carrillo N.Shear failure of anisotropic materials[C]//Proceedings of Boston Society of Civil Engineers.[S.l]:Society of Civil Engineering,1944:74-87.
  • 8Richardson M,Brand E W,Memon A.In-situ determination of anisotropy of soft clay[C]//Specialty Conference on In-situ Measurement of Soil Properties.Raleigh:ASTM,1975:336-349.
  • 9Davis E H,Christian J T.Bearing capacity of anisotropic cohesive soils[J].Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering Division,1971,98:126.
  • 10Hill R.The mathematical theory of plasticity[M].London:Oxford University Press,1950.

共引文献12

同被引文献54

引证文献5

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部