基于CNKI和WoS的国内与国际涉华舆情研究对比分析

Comparative Analysis of Domestic and Foreign China-related Public Opinion Based on CNKI and WoS

[目的/意义]对比分析国内与国际涉华舆情领域的学科分布、热点分布、主题分布等,对于揭示该领域的研究现状和未来发展趋势具有重要的意义。[方法/过程]选取国内中国知网数据库(CNKI)和国际WebofScience(WoS)核心合集中以涉华舆情为主题的研究成果为分析对象,进行信息抽取和数据预处理,并生成高频关键词共现矩阵和相异矩阵;通过内容分析法、系统聚类法和战略坐标图对该领域的研究热点和主题进行揭示和对比。[结果/结论]从学科分布角度来看,国内涉华舆情研究主要集中于新闻传播学科,而国际涉华舆情研究已呈现出多学科合作和跨学科交叉的发展态势;从热点分布及其动态发展角度来看,国内研究文献强烈反映出了涉华舆情的资政本质,而国际研究文献则注重微观视角的分析;从主题分布角度来看,无论国内文献还是国际文献,涉华舆情研究都有比较明晰的研究主题,但也都存在着多个发展不成熟、结构不稳定的边缘性研究主题。

[Purpose/significance]The comparative analysis of subject distribution,hotspots distribution and topic distribution in the field of China-related public opinion at home and abroad has a great significance for revealing the current research situation and future development trend in this field.[Method/process]The paper takes the researches on China-related public opinion in CNKI and WoS as the analysis objects,carries out information extraction and data preprocessing to generate high-frequency keyword co-occurrence matrix and dissimilarity matrix,reveals and compares the research hotspots and topics in the field through methods of content analysis,systematic clustering and strategic coordinate map.[Result/conclusion]From the perspective of subject distribution,the researches on China-related public opinion in China mainly focus on journalism and communication,while the researches on China-related public opinion abroad have shown a trend of multidisciplinary cooperation and interdisciplinary cross;from the perspective of hotspots distribution and its dynamic development,domestic researches strongly reflect political nature of China-related public opinion,while foreign researches pay attention to the micro perspective analysis;from the perspective of topic distribution,both domestic and foreign researches on China-related public opinion have clear topics,but there are also many marginal research topics with immature development and unstable structure.