期刊文献+

“右节点提升”构式的在线认知及韵律阐释 被引量:1

An Online Cognitive and Prosodic Approach to Right Node Raising Construction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文认为,“右节点提升”(Right Node Raising,RNR)不是句法现象,而是约定俗成的构式。但与讨论较多的及物构式、双及物构式等静态模板构式(Goldberg 2006)不同,RNR代表着一类动态构式,其形式表征不能完全由NP,V和VP等词汇短语类完成,而是由更加抽象、相当于一套构式建构的动态指令完成。我们同意Larson(2016)的观点,即听者对该构式的识解采取的是一种动态在线策略,而不是依靠传统上的离线静态表征。本文提出,对于RNR这种特殊构式的识解不能仅考虑句法结构,而是须要纳入动态在线的对比焦点、重音分配、工作记忆和注意力转移等认知视角,以使我们能够更加全面地理解RNR现象。本文提出的RNR构式动态在线认知阐释策略不仅可以解释常规RNR现象,还能解释对多重统领(MD)等句法理论造成严重挑战的特殊RNR现象。 This paper holds that Right Node Raising(RNR)is not a syntactic phenomenon,but a conventionalized construction.Different from the well-discussed static template constructions like transitives or ditransitives(Goldberg 2006),RNR embodies a category of dynamic constructions,the representation of which cannot be achieved in terms of lexical categories like NP,V and VP,but instead more in terms of a set of structure-building instructions.We agree with Larson(2006)that listeners resort to a kind of online strategy in interpreting RNR,rather than to traditional offline static representations.The paper proposes that,with regard to RNR,it is necessary not only to consider syntactic structure,but also to consider online operations of contrastive focus,stress distribution,working memory and shift of attention,in order to fully interpret RNR.The dynamic online cognitive interpretation(OCI)strategy for RNR construction proposed in this paper can not only explain normal RNR,but can also explain the special RNR expressions that pose severe challenges to multidominance syntactic theory.
作者 袁野 Yuan Ye(Beihang University,Beijing 100191,China)
出处 《外语学刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第6期46-53,共8页 Foreign Language Research
基金 教育部人文社科基金一般项目“汉语问句中焦点的韵律和句法研究”(18YJA740068) 北京市社科基金项目“汉语网络语言的认知构式语法研究”(15WYB050)的阶段性成果
关键词 右节点提升 动态构式 多重统领 对比焦点 在线认知阐释 Right Node Raising dynamic construction multidominance contrastive focus online cognitive interpretation
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献82

  • 1冯胜利.轻动词移位与古今汉语的动宾关系[J].语言科学,2005,4(1):3-16. 被引量:98
  • 2蔡维天.重温“为什么问怎么样,怎么样问为什么”——谈汉语疑问句和反身句中的内、外状语[J].中国语文,2007(3):195-207. 被引量:58
  • 3Adams, P. 2004. The structure of sluicing in Mandarin Chinese A]. In S. Arunachalam & T. Scheffler (eds.). Penn Working Papers in Linguistics I-C]. Philadelphia: Penn Linguistics Club. 1-16.
  • 4Adams, P. & S. Tomioka. 2012. Sluicing in Mandarin Chinese: An instance of pseudo- sluicing rA. In J. Merchant & A. Simpson (eds.). Sluicing: Cross-Linguistic Perspectives I-C]. Oxford: OUP. 219-247.
  • 5Bokovi6, P,. 2007. On the locality and motivation of move and agree: An even more mini- mal theory l-J. Linguistic Inquiry 38. 589-644.
  • 6Chomsky, N. 2001. Derivation by phase [-A. In M. Kenstowicz (ed.). Ken Hale A Life in Language [-C. Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press. 53-122.
  • 7Chung, S., W. Ladusaw & J. McCloskey. 1995. Sluicing and logical form [J]. Natural Lan- guage Semantics 3: 239-282.
  • 8Cinque, G. 1999. Adverbs and Inflectional Heads I-M. Oxford: OUP.
  • 9Cinque, G & L. Rizzi. 2008. The cartography of syntactic structures [A]. In V. Moscati (ed.). CISCL Working Papers on Language and Cognition [C]. Siena: CISCL. 43-59.
  • 10Evans, G. 1980. Pronouns [-J. Linguistic Inquiry 34. 143-154.

共引文献105

同被引文献7

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部