探讨新历史主义背景下关于英美文学功能的分析

"Subversion" and "Suppression"——On the Literary Function Theory and Ideology Discussion of New Historicism

新历史主义理论的提出对于英美学术界有着巨大的冲击力,以新颖的批评方式向传统社会历史批评和后结构形式主义批评提出了挑战,是文学史的一种改革,新历史主义接受文学在历史范畴内,反对将历史仅作为文学背景和反应对象的做法。新历史主义认为文学与背景之间有着紧密的联系,即"你中有我,我中有你"的相互影响。在新历史主义中,其认为文学是现实与社会批评形态的结合部,文学对于批评形态的形成与发展有着重要的意义。因此,本文从新历史主义背景下探究了文学功能和批评形态。

The proposal of the new historicism theory has a huge impact on the British and American academic circles. It challenges the traditional social history criticism and post-structural formalism criticism in a novel way of criticism. It is a reform of literary history and the acceptance of new historicism In the historical category, literature is against the practice of using history only as a literary background and response object. Neohistoricism believes that there is a close connection between literature and background,that is, the "interaction between you and me". In neo-historicism, literature is considered to be the combination of reality and social criticism, and literature is of great significance to the formation and development of criticism. Therefore, this article explores literary functions and critical forms from the aspects of "subversion" and "inhibition" of literature.