期刊文献+

无管化经皮肾镜治疗肾和输尿管上段结石 被引量:7

Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in treatment of renal and proximal ureteral calculi
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨无管化经皮肾镜碎石取石术(PCNL)治疗肾和输尿管上段结石的安全性、可行性和禁忌证。方法回顾性研究中山大学附属第三医院·岭南医院泌尿外科2016年11月至2018年5月80例PCNL患者临床资料,已排除脓肾结石患者,根据是否留置肾造瘘管分组:患者术后输尿管内留置双J管,同时留置肾造瘘管40例(传统PCNL组),术后只留置双J管,无留置肾造瘘管40例(无管化PCNL组)。结果两组患者年龄、肾和输尿管结石位置和结石负荷、肾积水直径、总手术时间和结石清除率等差异比较均无统计学意义。患者术后第一天疼痛评分(VAS)试验组比对照组低(3.4±0.9 vs 5.6±1.4),平均住院时间与对照组比较缩短(7.9±1.4 vs 8.8±1.6)d,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论无管化PCNL治疗非脓性肾输尿管上段结石安全可行,且可减轻患者术后疼痛,缩短住院时间。 Objective To investigate efficacy and safety of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy(PCNL) for the treatment of renal stone and proximal ureteral calculi. Methods From Nov. 2016 to May. 2018, the data of 80 inpatients without pyonephrosis underwent PCNL in Lingnan Hospital, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, were retrospectively evaluated. One group treated with traditional PCNL(D-J tube and nephrostomy tube, 40 cases) and the other with tubeless PCNL(D-J tube only and without nephrostomy tube, 40 cases). Results There was no significant difference between the two groups for the age, calculi location, stone load, diameter of hydronephrosis, total operative time and stone free rate(P>0.05). The mean postoperative VAS pain score and length of hospital stay were significantly lower and shorter in the tubeless PCNL group compared with the standard PCNL group [(3.4±0.9 vs 5.6±1.4);(7.9±1.4 vs 8.8±1.6) days;P<0.05]. Conclusion Tubeless PCNL is safe and effective for managing renal and proximal ureteral calculi without pyonephrosis, which has the advantage of reducing postoperative pain and shortening hospital stay.
作者 李腾成 方友强 杨飞 蔡佳荣 李文标 刘柏隆 周祥福 湛海伦 Li Tengcheng;Fang Youqiang;Yang Fei;Cai Jiarong;Li Wenbiao;Liu Bolong;Zhou Xiangfu;Zhan Hailun(Department of Urology,Lingnan Hospital,the Third Afflimed Hospitd of Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510530,China)
出处 《中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版)》 2019年第6期405-409,共5页 Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition)
基金 广州市科技计划项目(201806020067) 广州市科技计划项目(201704020052)
关键词 经皮肾镜 肾结石 输尿管结石 无管化 Percutaneous nephrolithotomy Renal stone Ureteral calculi Tubeless
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献74

  • 1Pietrow PK, Auge BK, Lallas CD, et al. Pain after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: impact of nephrostomy tube size. J Endourol, 2003, 17:411-414
  • 2Desai MR, Kukreja RA, Desai MM, et al. A prospective randomized comparison of type of nephrostomy drainage following percutaneous nephrostolithotomy:large bore versus small bore versus tubeless. J Urol, 2004, 172:565-567.
  • 3Lojanapiwat B, Soonthornphan S, Wudhikarn S. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in selected patients. J Endourol, 2001, 15: 711-713.
  • 4Shah H, Hegde S, Shah J, et al. Safety and efficacy of supracostal access in tubeless percutaneous nepbrolithotomy. J Endourol, 2006, 20:1016-1021.
  • 5Liatsikos EN, Horn D, Dinlenc CZ, eta. Tail stent versus reentry tube: A randomized comparison after percutaneous stone extraction. Urology, 2002, 59: 15-19.
  • 6Paul EM, Marcovich R, Lee BR, et al. Choosing the ideal nephrostomy tube. BJU Int, 2003, 92: 672-677.
  • 7Maheshwari PN, Andankar MG, Bansal M. Nephrostomy tube after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Large-bore or pigtail catheter? J Endourol, 2000, 14: 735-738.
  • 8高小峰,孙颖浩,王林辉,许传亮,高旭,盛夏,侯建国.利多卡因加布比卡因局部麻醉在前列腺穿刺活检术中的应用[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2007,28(9):619-622. 被引量:6
  • 9Istanbulluoglu MO, Cicek T, Ozturk B, et al. Percutaneous neph- rolithotomy: nephrostomy or tubeless or totally tubeless?. Urology, 2010, 75 : 1043-1046.
  • 10Resorlu B, Kara C, Sahin E, et al. Comparison of nephrostomy drainage types following percutaneous nephrolithotomy requiring muhiple tracts: single tube versus multiple tubes versus tubeless. Urol Int, 2011, 87: 23-27.

共引文献75

同被引文献59

引证文献7

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部