期刊文献+

基于熵权法-TOPSIS法的建筑施工人员风险感知水平研究 被引量:2

Research on Risk Perception Level of Construction Workers Based on Entropy Weight-TOPSIS Method
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为研究建筑施工从业人员风险感知水平,通过文献梳理和实地考察的方式确定建筑施工人员风险感知维度,并通过问卷调查的方式获取建筑一线施工人员有效调查问卷,采用集成熵权法和TOPSIS法计算建筑施工人员的风险感知水平和等级,结果表明:建筑施工人员的时间风险>身体功能风险>人身安全风险>组织风险>社会风险,其总体风险感知水平处于中等水平。 In order to study the risk perception level of construction workers,the risk perception dimensions of construction workers are determined through literature review and field surveys.The questionnaire survey is used to obtain an effective survey for front-line construction workers.The risk perception level of construction workers is calculated by the integrated entropy weight method and TOPSIS method.The results show that the time risk of construction workers>physical function risk>personal safety risk>organizational risk>social risk,and the overall level of risk perception is at a medium level.
作者 杨振宏 李盼 Yang Zhenhong;Li Pan(School of Resource Engineering,Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology,Xi’an,710055,Shaanxi)
出处 《建设科技》 2020年第3期133-137,共5页 Construction Science and Technology
关键词 安全管理 施工人员 熵权法 TOPSIS 风险感知 safety management construction workers entropy weight method TOPSIS risk perception
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献70

  • 1谢晓非,徐联仓.风险认知研究概况及理论框架[J].心理科学进展,1995,5(2):17-22. 被引量:179
  • 2邓汉慧,张子刚.西蒙的有限理性研究综述[J].中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2004,4(6):37-41. 被引量:60
  • 3Bohm,G.and H.R.Pfister,2000,“Action Tendencies and Characteristics of Environmental Risks”,Acta Psychologica,vol.104,pp.317-337.
  • 4Byrnes,J.P.,D.C.Miller and W.D.Schafer,1999,“Gender Differences in Risk Taking:A Meta-Analysis”,Psycho-logical Bulletin,vol.125,pp.367-383.
  • 5Douglas,M.,1985,Risk Acceptability According to the Social Sciences,New York:Russell Sage Foundation.
  • 6Earle,T.C.and M.K.Lindell,1984,“Public Perceptions of Industrial Risks:A Free-Response Approach”,in R.A.Waller and V.T.Covello(eds.),Low-Probability/High-Consequence Risk Analysis,New York:Plenum Press,pp.531-550.
  • 7Fischhoff,B.,et al.,1978,“How Safe is Safe enough?A Psychometric Study of Attitudes towards Technological Risks andBenefits”,Policy Sciences,vol.9,pp.127-152.
  • 8Flynn,J.,P.Slovic and C.K.Mertz,1994,“Gender,Race,and Perception of Environmental Health Risks”,Risk Anal-ysis,vol.14,no.6,pp.1101-1108.
  • 9Gillian,H.and G.Rowe,2008,“A Characterisation of the Methodology of Qualitative Research on the Nature of PerceivedRisk:Trends and Omissions”,Journal of Risk Research,vol.11,no.5,p.617.
  • 10Hampel,J.,2006,“Different Concepts of Risk:A Challenge for Risk Communication”,International Journal of MedicalMicrobiology,vol.296,pp.5-10.

共引文献261

同被引文献18

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部