期刊文献+

共享经济下网约工法律关系分析与制度回应--以及时送达众包平台为例 被引量:3

Legal Relationship Analysis and Institutional Response of Online Contract Workers in the Sharing Economy--Taking Timely Delivery of Crowdsourcing Platform as an Example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对网约工法律关系的分析应具体落实到平台、第三方劳务公司、实际需求方等主体。平台信息中介地位应当实质判断,引入第三方劳务公司有助于社会利益最大化。实际需求方订立运输合同,不应认定劳务关系。在制度供给不足情形下,司法认定标准不一,因而需要相关制度衔接以实现利益平衡。网约工权益应针对不同用工形态进行分类保护,主要对专职化的众包用工进行倾斜保护。众包平台与网约工的劳动关系应当推定排除,相关权益保护可以通过设立灵活用工工伤保险基金以及完善商业保险制度等配套措施进行强化。 The analysis of network contract labor legal relationship should be specifically implemented to the platform,the third-party labor company,the actual demander and other subjects.The intermediary status of platform should be judged in essence and the introduction of third-party labor companies is conducive to the maximization of social benefits.When the actual demander enters into a transport contract,the labor relationship should not be recognized.In the case of insufficient system supply,judicial identification standards are different,so relevant systems need to be connected to achieve the balance of interests.The rights and interests of network contract workers should be classified and protected according to different employment patterns,and the professional crowdsourced labor should be protected in a preferential way.Crowdsourcing platforms should be presumed to exclude labor relations,and the protection of relevant rights and interests can be strengthened through the establishment of flexible employment injury insurance fund and the improvement of commercial insurance system.
作者 马欢军 Ma Huanjun
出处 《贵州省党校学报》 2020年第2期62-69,共8页 Journal of Guizhou Provincial Party School
关键词 共享经济 零工经济 网约工 劳动关系 劳务关系 sharing economy odd job economy network contract workers labor relations labor service relations
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献96

  • 1吕琳.论“劳动者”主体界定之标准[J].法商研究,2005,22(3):30-36. 被引量:57
  • 2郑尚元.雇佣关系调整的法律分界——民法与劳动法调整雇佣类合同关系的制度与理念[J].中国法学,2005(3):80-89. 被引量:76
  • 3董保华.和谐劳动关系的思辨[J].上海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007,36(2):22-29. 被引量:58
  • 4[德]雷蒙德·瓦尔特曼.《德国劳动法》,沈建峰,译,法律出版社,2014年版,第46页.
  • 5See Daniel Rauch and David Schleicher, Like Uber, But for Local Government Policy: The Future of Local Regulation of the "Shared Economy", http://marroninstitute.nyu.edu/uploads/content/The_Future of Local_Regulation of the Shared_Economy.pdf, last visit on March 21,2015.
  • 6See Douglas O'Connor, et al., v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al., Case No. 13-cv-03826-EMC., Docket No. 251 (2015).
  • 7See Douglas O'Connor, et al., v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al., Case No. 13-cv-03826-EMC., Docket No. 357 (2015).
  • 8See Dan Levine, Uber Drivers' Labor Lawsuit Granted Class Action Status in California, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/ uber-drivers-labor-lawsuit-granted-class-action-status-in-california us 55e60a54e4b0b7a9633aa657, last visit on March 18, 2015.
  • 9See Naravan v. EGL, Inc., 616 F. 3d 901 (9th Cir. 2010).
  • 10See Yellow Cab Coop. Inc. v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd., 226 Cal. App. 3d 1288 (1991).

共引文献646

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部