期刊文献+

基于深层学习的师范生专业技能教学提升策略

Promotion Strategy of Professional Skill Teaching for Normal University Students Based on Deep Learning
下载PDF
导出
摘要 师范生往往被动参与专业技能学习,学习效率不高,其主要原因是师范生在专业技能学习中往往表现为"沉默者",以及教师对师范生专业技能学习的指导与评价不到位。深层学习注重理解反思、迁移运用,有助于调动师范生专业技能学习的自觉性,也有助于帮助师范生提高专业技能学习效率。以深层学习有关理论为指导,教师可以提供高质量的具有模仿价值的技能示范,引导师范生提升专业技能学习策略,以多元评价推动专业技能的拓展应用,提高师范生专业技能学习质量。 Normal university students often take a passive part in learning professional skills with low learning efficiency.The main reasons are that normal university students are usually"silent"in learning professional skills,guidance and evaluation on learning professional skills are not in place.Deep learning pays attention to understanding,reflection,transfer and application,which is conducive to mobilizing the consciousness of learning professional skills of normal university students and helping them improve the efficiency of learning professional skills.Under the guidance of related theories of deep learning,teachers can provide high-quality skills demonstration with imitation value,guide normal university students to improve their learning strategies of professional skills,promote the expansion and application of professional skills through multiple evaluation,and improve the learning quality of professional skills of normal university students.
作者 董淑朵 DONG Shuduo(School of Preschool Education,Lianyungang Normal College,Lianyungang 222006,China)
出处 《连云港师范高等专科学校学报》 2020年第2期89-93,共5页 Journal of Lianyungang Normal College
关键词 教师教育 师范生 专业技能 深层学习 教学策略 teacher education normal students professional skills deep learning teaching strategy
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献41

  • 1叶晓芸,秦鉴.论浅层学习与深度学习[J].软件导刊,2006,5(01X):19-21. 被引量:51
  • 2孙银黎.对深度学习的认识[J].绍兴文理学院学报,2007,27(11):34-36. 被引量:73
  • 3HEA Engineering Subject Centre. 2004. Deep and Surface Approaches to Learning. http: //www.engsc.ac.uk/er/theory/learning. asp.
  • 4Biggs, J. Teaching for quality learning at university. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open Univer- sity Press. 2003: 16- 17.
  • 5Thomas, E& Nelson, L. Deep Learning and College Outcomes: Do Fields of Study Differ? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Institutional Research. 2005, May 29 -June l, SanDiego, CA.
  • 6Entwistle, N. 1991. Leaming andstudying; contrasts andinfluence, http: //www. newhorizons, org/future/Creating-the_Fu- ture/crfut-entwistle, html.
  • 7Thomas F. 2006. Disciplinary differences in faculty members' emphasis on deep approaches to learning, http: //fsse. iub. edu/ pdf/2006AIRFSSEDeepLearningFI NAL. pdf.
  • 8Offir B, Lev Y. & Bezalel R. et al. Surface and deep learning processes in distance education; synchronous versus asynchronous systems. Computers & Education, 2008 (51): 1172-1183.
  • 9Offir B, Lev Y. & Bezalel R. et al. Surface and deep learning processes in distance education; synchronous versus asynchronous sys- tems. Computers & Education, 2008 (51): 1172-1183.
  • 10Grauerholz, Liz. Teaching Holistically to Achieve Deep Learning. College Teaching. 2001, Spring, Vol. 49, Issue 2: 44- 50.

共引文献85

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部