期刊文献+

船舶应急抛锚计算方法研究 被引量:4

Research on Calculation Method of Emergency Anchoring
下载PDF
导出
摘要 应用常规经验公式和有限元CEL大变形计算方法,结合抛锚试验,研究了上海LNG管道项目北港5 wt级船舶8.3 t船锚、南港40 wt级船舶18.80 t船锚在BSZ111等多个钻孔点的应急抛锚贯入深度情况,其中CEL方法还考虑了正面贯入、窄面斜向贯入和宽面斜向贯入情况.公式法计算的应急抛锚最大贯入深度北港为2.60m,南港为3.13 m,而有限元CEL大变形计算方法得出北港为2.86 m,南港为5.24 m.结果表明:CEL方法计算所得窄边(60°)贯入深度普遍大于经验公式计算所得值,说明横截面积的变化是影响贯入深度计算的重要因素.公式法的结果受到土壤系数恒定不变因素的限制,无法考虑贯入过程中土壤的竖向和横向刚度的变化,结果相对偏小,而CEL法可考虑多层土壤刚度以及土壤刚度随土层变形增加后的折减,计算过程更为客观,结果偏于安全考虑,适合作为设计依据.所以,对土层组成相对单一时可采用公式法,而对土层组成多变的复杂情况,建议采用更加客观和安全的CEL方法. The emergency anchoring penetration depths of 8.3 t anchor of 5 wt class ship in North Port and 18.80 t anchor of 40 wt class ship in South Port of Shanghai LNG Pipeline Project at BSZ111 and other drilling points are studied by using the conventional empirical formula and finite element CEL large deformation calculation method,combined with anchoring tests.The CEL method also considers frontal penetration,narrow oblique penetration and wide oblique penetration.The maximum penetration depth of emergency anchoring calculated by the formula method is 2.60 M in North Port and 3.13 M in South Port,while that calculated by finite element CEL large deformation calculation method is 2.86 m in North Port and 5.24 m in South Port.The results show that the penetration depth of the narrow edge(60 degrees)calculated by CEL method is generally larger than that calculated by empirical formula,indicating that the change of cross-sectional area is an important factor affecting the calculation of penetration depth.The results of the formula method are limited by the constant and invariable factors of soil coefficient.It is impossible to consider the changes of vertical and transverse stiffness of soil during penetration.The results are relatively small.The CEL method can consider the multi-layer soil stiffness and the reduction of soil stiffness with the soil deformation.The calculation process is more objective,and the results are in favor of safety considerations,which is suitable for design basis.Therefore,when the composition of the soil layer is relatively single,the formula method can be used,while for the complex situation of the varying composition of the stratum,the more objective and safe CEL method is suggested.
作者 马希钦 胡瀚誉 蔡新永 母德伟 何进朝 MA Xiqin;HU Hanyu;CAI Xinyong;MU Dewei;HE Jinchao(Southwest Institute of Water Transportation Engineering Science,Chongqing Jiaotong University,Chongqing 400016,China;School of River&Ocean Engineering,Chongqing Jiaotong University,Chongqing 400074,China)
出处 《力学季刊》 CSCD 北大核心 2020年第2期353-362,共10页 Chinese Quarterly of Mechanics
基金 国家重点研发计划(2016YFC0402006) 国家自然科学基金(51408082) 交通运输部应用基础与前沿项目(2015319814040)。
关键词 应急抛锚 贯入深度 有限元分析 耦合拉格朗日欧拉算法 emergency broke down penetration depth finite element coupled Eulerian-Lagrange
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献30

  • 1刘学涛,张磊,郭振邦,徐慧.锚泊作业对海底管道撞击概率的研究[J].石油工程建设,2005,31(6):30-33. 被引量:7
  • 2DNV RPF107-2001, Risk Assessment of Pipeline Protection[S].
  • 3Katteland L H, Oygarden B. Risk analysis of dropped objects for deep water development[A]. Proc. of 14th OMAE[C]. Copenhagen:OMAE, 1995. 443-450.
  • 4Jensen J J. Impact Strength of Concrete Coating on Pipeline [R]. Trondheim: SINTEF, 1978.
  • 5江锦.马洪新,秦立成.几种典型海底管道修复技术[C]//中国海洋(岸)工程学术讨论会论文集,2011.
  • 6郭振邦,张群站,徐慧.海底管道关于锚泊作业的定量风险评估[J].天津理工大学学报,2007,23(5):85-88. 被引量:12
  • 7GB/T 546-1997霍尔锚[S].1997.
  • 8DNV-RP-F107 Risk assessment of pipeline protection[S].2010.
  • 9Mabsout M E,Tassoulas J.A finite element model for the simulation of pile driving[J].J Numer and Anal Methods Geomech,1994,37:257-278.
  • 10Paul J,Ayman E,Jason S.The latest developments in the design and simulation of deepwater subsea oil and gas pipelines using FEA[C]// Proc Third International Deep-Ocean Technology Symposium,Beijing,China,2009.

共引文献59

同被引文献19

引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部