期刊文献+

市民社会对福斯塔夫骑士主体性的消解

Civil Society’s Deconstruction of the Subjectivity of John Falstaff as a Knight
下载PDF
导出
摘要 中世纪后期,从封建生产方式中游离出来的骑士在进入资本主义生产方式时面临困境:一方面,他们的思维和行动受到封建骑士生产方式建构的骑士主体性的影响;另一方面,他们因为无法参与到资本主义财富生产过程,因而无法获得生存需要的物质资料,不得不依靠不法手段获得物质财富。尽管经历着价值理性和工具理性以及灵魂和肉体之间的矛盾,福斯塔夫获取生存资料的方式和人们对他作为骑士和新教教徒的文化期待之间仍存在差距。之所以如此,是因为骑士精神和新教伦理对福斯塔夫的制约作用无法抵制物质财富对他的吸引力。因此,福斯塔夫一方面利用一切机会获得物质财富;另一方面通过幽默、智慧和俏皮等消解个人和社会以及人之所是和人不得不成为其所不是之间的尖锐对立。《亨利四世》通过一系列情境揭示了社会变革时期福斯塔夫如何消解自身和社会之间的对立以及市民社会如何消除封建骑士生产方式建构的骑士主体性的过程。 In the Late Middle Ages,the knights alienated from the feudal mode of production were confronted with a dilemma when entering the capitalist mode of production.On the one hand,their ways of thinking and behaviors were influenced by the subjectivity as the knights that were constructed by the feudal knight mode of production;on the other hand,they had to rely on the illegal means to obtain material wealth because they could neither participate in the production process of capitalist wealth nor obtain the material goods for their survival.Although Falstaff was experiencing the contradictions between value rationality and instrumental rationality as well as soul and body,a gap existed between the way Falstaff acquired the materials for his survival and the cultural expectations people had for him as a knight and a Protestant,because the constraints of chivalry and Protestant ethic on Falstaff failed to conquer the appeal of the material wealth to him.Therefore,Falstaff,on the one hand,exploited every opportunity to gain the material wealth;on the other hand,he dispelled the sharp opposition between the individual and the society,as well as why man was what he was and why man had to be what he was not,by means of humor,wisdom and sally.A series of situations in Henry IV reveal how Falstaff resolved the antagonism between human individuals and the society,and how civil society dispelled the subjectivity as a knight that was constructed by the feudal knight mode of production.
作者 廖金罗 LIAO Jin-luo(School of Foreign Languages,Central South University,Changsha 410083,China)
出处 《海南大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2020年第4期120-128,共9页 Journal of Hainan University (Humanities & Social Sciences)
关键词 骑士生产方式 骑士主体性 市民社会 主体性消解 knight mode of production subjectivity as a knight civil society deconstruction of subjectivity
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献24

  • 1亚当·斯密.《国民财富的性质和原因的研究》上卷[M].商务印书馆,1997年版.第5页.
  • 2.《马克思恩格斯全集》第1版第3卷[M].,.第514页.
  • 3.《1844年经济学哲学手稿》(单行本)[M].人民出版社,2000年版.第82页.
  • 4.《马克思恩格斯选集》第2版第2卷[M].,..
  • 5.《马克思恩格斯全集》第2版第30卷[M].,.第539页.
  • 6马克思:《1844年经济学哲学手稿》(单行本),[北京]人民出版社2000年版,第60页.
  • 7[日]森田桐郎,望月清司.《社会认识和历史理论》,日本评论社1974年版第71页.
  • 8平田清明.《市民社会和社会主义》.岩波书店1959年版.
  • 9[日]广松涉编注.《文献学语境中的<德意志意识形态>》,南京大学出版社2005年版第50页,第38页,第146页.
  • 10G. W. F. Hegel, Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts,Herausgegeben von J. Hoffmeister, 1955, S.182f.

共引文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部