期刊文献+

机器人辅助腹腔镜下根治性前列腺切除术后早期拔除导尿管的临床疗效 被引量:4

A clinical study of early catheter removal after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的总结机器人辅助腹腔镜下根治性前列腺切除术(RALP)后早期拔除导尿管的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析2016年12月至2018年1月期间157例接受RALP的前列腺癌患者的临床资料,分为术后7d拔除导尿管组(n=55)和术后14d拔除导尿管组(n=102)。术后7d拔除组中位年龄68(63~72)岁;术后14d拔除组中位年龄68(63~72)岁。临床分期T2aN0M0~T4N0M0期,其中T2a期36例,T2b期24例,T2c期64例,T3a期18例,T3b期10例,T4期8例。Gleason评分6~10分,其中<7分35例,7分75例,>7分47例。记录患者拔除导尿管后有无发生尿潴留、即刻漏尿量、疼痛评分(VAS)、术后1个月和3个月尿控恢复情况。结果两组均没有发生尿潴留。术后7d拔除组、术后14d拔除组拔管后即刻漏尿量中位数分别为5(5~15)、10(5~16.25)mL(P=0.118);术后1个月尿控恢复分别为18.18%(10/55)、20.59%(21/102)(P=0.923);术后3个月尿控恢复分别为40.38%(21/55)、42.16%(43/102)(P=0.63);差异均无显著性统计学意义。拔管当天VAS评分术后7d拔除组显著优于术后14d组,差异具有显著统计学差异(P<0.001)。结论RALP术后早期拔除导尿管在无法行膀胱造影的前提下仍然安全、有效,可以有效减轻患者疼痛症状,不影响近期尿控恢复。 Objective To analyze the clinical outcome of early catheter removal after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy(RALP).Methods The clinical date of 157 prostate cancer patients treated with RALP during Dec.2016 and Jan.2018 were retrospectively analyzed.The patients were divided into 7 d group(catheter removed 7 days after operation,n=55)and 14 d group(catheter removed14 days after operation,n=102).The median age was 68(63-72)years in7 d group and68(63-72)years in14 d group.The classification of clinical stages in this study ranged from T2 aN0 M0 to T4 N0 M0,including T2 a in 36 cases,cT2 b in24 cases,T2 c in64 cases,T3 a in18 cases,T3 b in10 cases,and T4 in8 cases.Gleason score ranged from6 to10,including<7 in 35 cases,=7 in 75 cases,and>7 in 47 cases.After catheter removal,the following data were recorded,including incidence of acute urinary retention,urinary leakage volume,visual analogue scale(VAS),urinary continence 1 month and 3 months after operation.Results No acute urinary retention was observed.The urinary leakage volume was 5(5-15)mL in 7 d group and10(5-16.25)mL in14 d group(P=0.118).The 1 month urinary continence recovery was 18.18%(10/55)in7 d group and20.59%(21/102)in14 d group(P=0.923).The 3 month urinary continence recovery was 40.38%(21/55)in 7 d group and 42.16%(43/102)in 14 d group(P=0.63).There was no statistical difference in VAS between the two groups(P<0.001).Conclusion Early catheter removal after RALP can be safe and effective even without cystography.It can relieve pain without affecting short-term urinary continence.
作者 王岩 费笑晨 樊连城 王艳青 沙建军 潘家骅 董柏君 朱寅杰 薛蔚 WANG Yan;FEI Xiao-chen;FAN Lian-cheng;WANG Yan-qing;SHA Jian-jun;PAN Jia-hua;DONG Bai-jun;ZHU Yin-jie;XUE Wei(Department of Urology,Renji Hospital,School of Medicine,Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai 200127,China)
出处 《现代泌尿外科杂志》 CAS 2020年第9期806-809,共4页 Journal of Modern Urology
关键词 机器人 腹腔镜 前列腺肿瘤 前列腺切除术 早期拔除 导尿管 robot laparoscopy prostatic neoplasm prostatectomy early removal catheter
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献34

  • 1Abdollah F, Sun M, Schmitges J, Tian Z, Jeldres C, et al. Cancer-specific and other-cause mortality after radical prostatectomy versus observation in patients with prostate cancer: competing-risks analysis of a large North American population-based cohort. Eur Uro1201 ] , 60: 920-30.
  • 2Popken G, Sommerkamp H, Schultze-Seemann W, Wetterauer U, Katzenwadel A. Anastomotic stricture after radical prostatectomy: incidence, findings and treatment. Eur Uro11998, 33: 382-6,.
  • 3Besarani D, Amoroso P, Kirby R, Bladder neck contracture after radical retropubic prostatectomy. BJU Int 2004, 94: 1245-7.
  • 4Augustin H, Pummer K, Daghofer F, Habermann H, Primus G, et al. Patient self-reporting questionnaire on urological morbidity and bother after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Eur Uro12002, 42: 112-7.
  • 5Borboroglu PG, Sands JP, Roberts JL, Amling CL. Risk factors for vesicourethral anastomotic stricture after radical prostatectomv. Uroloy 2000, 56: 96-100.
  • 6Ozu C, Hagiuda J, Nakagami Y, Hamada R, Horiguchi Y, et aL Radical retropubic prostatectomy with running vesicourethral anastomosis and early catheter removal: our experience. Int J Uro12009, 16: 487-92.
  • 7Kostakopoulos A, Argiropoulos V, Protogerou V, Tekerlekis P, Melekos M. Vesicourethral anastomotic strictures after radical retropubic prostatectomy: the experience of a single institution. Urol Int2004, 72: 17-20.
  • 8Kumar P, Nargund VH, Management of post-radical prostatectomy anastomotic stricture by endoscopictransurethral balloon dilatation. Scandd UrolNephrol2007, 41:314-5.
  • 9Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, et al. The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardization Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 2002, 21: 167-78.
  • 10Walsh PC. Anatomic radical prostatectomy. Evolution of the surgical technique. J Urol1998, 160: 2418-24.

共引文献21

同被引文献42

引证文献4

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部