期刊文献+

外科医师手术能力定量化评价方法研究 被引量:6

Study on Quantitative Evaluation Method of Surgical Ability of Surgeons
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探究外科医师手术能力的评价方法。方法根据文献分析法、专家咨询法确定骨科医师手术能力评价指标,通过相对值法确定不同分级手术的难度分值。依据以资源为基础的相对价值理论确定手术时间和术后住院日校正系数。结果四级手术的主要难度分值分别为100分、187分、267分和344分,手术医师术中主刀、一助、二助、三助和四助的权重分别为1.0、0.7、0.4、0.3和0.2。住院医师、主治医师、副主任医师和主任医师的手术能力得分分别为1 070.03分、1 153.10分、1 601.61分和1 842.56分。结论构建的骨科医师手术能力评定方法具有可操作性,为研制其他医师手术能力的评价提供参考。 Objective To explore the method of evaluating surgeon’s operation ability.Methods The evaluation indices were determined through the method of expert consultation and documentary analysis.The difficulty scores of different operation grades were estimated by adapting the method the relative value of operation cost.The resourcebased relative value method(RBRVS)was adopted to correct the indices.Results Operative difficulty scores of orthopaedics in different grades were 100,187,267 and 344 respectively by the quantification of surgical costs.The weights of chief surgeon and four types of surgical assistant were 1.0,0.7,0.4,0.3 and 0.2,respectively.The average operating ability scores of residents,attending physicians,associate chief physicians and chief physicians were 1070.03,1153.10,1601.61 and 1842.56 respectively.Conclusion The evaluation method of surgeon’s operation ability constructed in this study is operable,which can provide reference for surgeon’s operation ability evaluation.
作者 夏云 唐瑞瑞 孙佳 黄雪飞 曹晓琳 罗力 XIA Yun;TANG Rui-rui;SUN Jia(Huashan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University,Shanghai,200040,China)
出处 《中国医院管理》 北大核心 2020年第10期39-41,共3页 Chinese Hospital Management
基金 上海市卫生和计划生育委员会政策研究课题项目(2018HP18)。
关键词 手术能力 外科医师 评价方法 operation ability orthopedic surgeon evaluation method
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献11

  • 1Good medical practice for physicians-Prepared by the Federation of Royal Colleges of Physicians of the UK. 2004( ISBN 186016 202 9 ).
  • 2Hsiao WC, Braun P, Yntema D, et al. Estimating physicians' work for a resource-based relative-value scale[ J ]. NEJM, 1988, 319 (13):835 - 841.
  • 3Gorrindo T, Goldfarb E, Bimbaum RJ, et al. Simulation-based ongoing professional practice evaluation in psychiatry: a novel tool for performance assessment [ J ]. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf,2013,39(7) :319 -323.
  • 4Kavic MS. Competency and the Six Core Competencies [ J ]. JSLS ,2002, (6) :95 -97.
  • 5Makary MA, Wick E and Freischlag JA. PPE, OPPE, and FPPE: complying with the new alphabet soup of credentialing[ J]. Arch Surg ,2011,146 ( 6 ) :642 - 644.
  • 6Wiersema MJ and Mergener K. Current procedural terminology, Resource-based Relative Value Scale, and the Center for Medi- care and Medicaid Services: overview [ J]. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am,2006,16(4) :775 -787.
  • 7Sherry L. Smith, Susan Clark, Zach hochstetler, et al. Medicare RBRVS 2013 The Physicians' s Guide [ J]. American Medical Association, 2013 : 682 - 684.
  • 8曹伟.关于卫生人才评价的探索与改革[J].医学与社会,2010,23(8):44-46. 被引量:13
  • 9郭志伟.DRGs的原理与方法及在我国的应用对策[J].中国卫生经济,2010,29(8):37-39. 被引量:136
  • 10郁晓霞,李廷玉,王萱玲.论新医改背景下公立医院人事制度改革[J].重庆文理学院学报(社会科学版),2010,29(5):105-107. 被引量:11

共引文献34

同被引文献47

引证文献6

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部