期刊文献+

论中概股危机下中美跨境审计监管合作 被引量:20

On the Cooperation between China and the United States in Cross-border Audit Supervision during the China Concept Stock Crisis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 瑞幸咖啡公司财务造假事件导致在美上市中概股面临集体被强制退市的风险。中概股公司财务审计质量是中美两国监管机构的共同关注点,但两国在跨境审计监管合作执法方式、审计工作底稿交接上存在分歧并久未解决。中美跨境审计监管合作分歧源于两国对国家主权的不同态度、审计工作底稿保密性要求的差异、证券监管机构执法权限的不同。遵循国际证券监管合作惯例,在双边或多边合作框架下共同推进联合检查,是破解中美跨境审计监管合作僵局的有效方式。为顺利有效开展联合检查,可以采取分流中概股公司、分类处理审计工作底稿的措施。此外,加强境外上市中国公司的境内监管、提升中概股公司整体质量,则是预防中概股危机的治本之策。 Chinese companies listed in the United States are at risk of being collectively delisted as a result of Luckin Coffee’s financial fraud.The financial audit quality of Chinese companies is a common concern of both Chinese and American regulators.However,differences between the two countries in cross-border supervision cooperation and law enforcement as well as in the audit working papers have made it impossible to effectively solve the problem.The different attitudes of China and the United States towards national sovereignty,the differences in law enforcement authority between China and the United States securities regulators,and the confidentiality requirements of audit working papers have collectively contributed to the current predicament of cross-border audit regulatory cooperation between China and the United States.Following the practice of international securities regulatory cooperation,carrying out joint inspections under the framework of bilateral or multilateral cooperation is an effective way to break the deadlock of cross-border audit regulatory cooperation between China and the United States.In order to carry out joint inspections smoothly and effectively,measures may be taken to separate Chinese companies and classify audit working papers.In addition,strengthening the domestic supervision of Chinese companies listed abroad and improving the overall quality of Chinese-listed companies are the ultimate solution to the delisting crisis.
作者 李有星 潘政 Li Youxing;Pan Zheng
出处 《证券市场导报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第10期72-78,共7页 Securities Market Herald
基金 国家社科基金重点项目“地方金融监管立法理论与实践研究”(项目编号:19AFX020)。
关键词 中概股 跨境审计监管 审计工作底稿 联合检查 监管合作 Chinese concept shares cross-border audit supervision audit working papers joint inspection supervision cooperation
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献56

  • 1何志鹏,孙璐.可持续发展的国际法保障[J].当代法学,2005,19(1):14-26. 被引量:7
  • 2刘燕.走下“自由裁量权”的神坛 重新解读凯立案及“自由裁量权”之争[J].中外法学,2002,14(5):540-570. 被引量:9
  • 3Barbara Crutchfield George & Kathleen A. Lacey, "A Comparative Analysis nl Post-3art)anes-oxley torporate t,overn- ante Developments in the US and European Union: The Impact of Tensions Created by Extraterritorial Application of Seetion 404", 53 The American Journal f Comparative lxw( 2006).
  • 4Balazs Fekete, "Recent Trends in Extraterritorial Jurisdiction-The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and Its Implications on Sovereign- ly". 49 Actn Juridica Hungariea( 2008).
  • 5Marianne Ojo, "The Role of the IASB and Auditing Standards in the Aftermath of the 2008/2009 Financial Crisis", 16 EurqJean Ixtw Journal(2010).
  • 6Dinh Tran Ngoc Huy, "The Backbone of European Corporate Governance Standards after Financial Crisis, Corporate Scandals and Manipulation", 1 Asian Journal f Management and Business Sciences(2011).
  • 7See Jamal lbrahim Haidar, "Investor protections and eeonmnic growth", 103 Eeortomics Letter, s(2009), p. 2.
  • 8Klaus J. ttopt, "Modern Company and Capital Market Problems: Improving European Corporate Governance after Enron", in John Armour & Joseph A. MeCahery( ed. ), After Enron: hnproving Corporate Law and Modernising Securities Regulation in Ettrope and the US, Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2006, p. 44.
  • 9See Jill E. Fisch, "Rethinking the regulation of securities intermediaries", 158 University of Pennsylvania Law Review(2010), p. 1961.
  • 10See Donald C. Clark, "Nothing but Wind? The Past and Future of Comparative Corporate Governance", 59 American Journal of Compara- tive lnw(2fll 1 ), p 79.

同被引文献224

引证文献20

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部