期刊文献+

认罪认罚从宽制度中起诉裁量权的扩张与规范 被引量:1

Expansion and Standardization of Prosecuting Discretional Right of the Systemof Leniency for Pleading Guilty and Accepting Punishment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 “两高三部”发布的《关于适用认罪认罚从宽制度的指导意见》在《刑事诉讼法》基础上进一步丰富明确了检察机关起诉裁量权,但起诉裁量权扩张可能引发检察机关司法腐败和司法随意,架空人民法院审判权,损害被害人合法权益甚至导致法律信任危机。由于认罪认罚起诉裁量权的监督制约机制亦不完善,因此现阶段应当在借鉴域外经验的基础上明确认罪认罚从宽制度中特殊不起诉适用条件的认定标准,完善不起诉决定内外监督制约机制,保障被害人知情权、异议权和救济权,确保犯罪嫌疑人获得有效辩护,充分优化认罪认罚从宽制度起诉裁量权的制度生态。 The Guidelines on The System of Leniency for Pleading Guilty and Accepting Punishment enriched and clarified pro discretionary right on the basis of the Law of Criminal Procedure.With the expansion of pro discretionary right, it may lead to judicial corruption of procuratorial authority, deprive jurisdiction of courts,damage the rights of victims, and even bring trust crisis to law. However the supervision and restraint mechanism of this system is not perfect,therefore, it’s necessary to make clear the determination standard of special non-prosecution by drawing on foreign experience,improve the internal and external supervision and restraint mechanism of non-prosecution decision,guarantee the victims’ right and ensure the effective defense of criminal suspects. Fully optimize the institutional ecology of pro discretionary right in the system of leniency for pleading guilty and accepting punishment.
作者 杨开湘 谭雅文 YANG Kai-xiang;TAN Ya-wen(Law School,Central South University,Changsha 410012,China)
机构地区 中南大学法学院
出处 《哈尔滨师范大学社会科学学报》 2020年第5期52-56,共5页 Journal of Social Science of Harbin Normal University
关键词 起诉裁量权 审查起诉 认罪认罚从宽 pro discretionary right examination and prosecution the system of leniency for pleading guilty and accepting punishment
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献67

共引文献266

同被引文献20

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部