期刊文献+

数据库课程实训报告互评系统设计与实现 被引量:2

Design and Implementation of Database Course Training Report Mutual Evaluation System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 面对教师在数据库实践教学过程中评阅实训报告工作任务重的问题,设计实现了实训报告互评系统。教师通过系统发布实训任务,学生通过系统提交实训报告。然后系统根据实训报告分发规则,将实训报告分发给同课程的其他学生进行评阅,被评阅者对评阅者给出满意度反馈;系统根据成绩统计规则计算每份实训报告的成绩,教师可以按课程导出全部实训任务的成绩报告。该平台不仅可以减轻教师评阅实训报告的压力,还能提升学生的学习效果。 Facing the heavy task of reviewing training reports in the teaching process of the teacher talent database,a mutual evaluation system for training reports was designed and implemented.Teachers release training tasks through the system,and students submit training reports through the system.Then the system distributes the training report to other students in the same course for review according to the training report distribution rules,and the reviewee gives feedback on the satisfaction of the reviewer.The system calculates the performance of each training report according to the performance statistics rules.Teachers can export score reports for all training tasks according to courses.This platform can not only reduce the pressure of teachers to review training reports in the training classroom,but also improve the learning effect of students.
作者 吴名星 WU Mingxing(School of Software,Changsha Social Work College,Changsha 410004,China)
出处 《现代信息科技》 2020年第18期29-31,35,共4页 Modern Information Technology
基金 湖南省教育厅科学研究项目(18B593)。
关键词 数据库课程实训 同伴互评 实训报告互评 database course training peer evaluation training report mutual evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献26

  • 1尹睿.基于专题的网络协作学习活动设计的行动研究[J].现代教育技术,2005,15(4):33-39. 被引量:7
  • 2张倩.网络环境下同伴匿名评价实证研究[J].电化教育研究,2007,28(7):55-57. 被引量:12
  • 3Terence J Crooks.The Impact of Classroom Evaluation Practices on Students[J].Review of Educational Research, 1988, (4):438 -481.
  • 4Marjo Van zundert,Dominique Sluijsmans,Jeroen Van merrinboer.Effective Peer Assessment Processes: Research Findings and Future Directions[J].Leaming and Instrnction,2010, (4):270-279.
  • 5Nancy Falchikov, Judy Goldfinch.Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education: a Meta-analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Marks[J].Review of Educational Research,2000, (3):287-322.
  • 6Hovardas T, Tsivitanidou OE,Zacharia ZC. Peer Versus Expert Feedback: an Investigation of the Quality of Peer Feedback Among Secondary School Students[J]. Computers & Education, 2014, (71 ): 133-152.
  • 7Yang Y, Tsai C. Conceptions of and Approaches to Learning Through Online Peer Assessment[J]. Learning and Instruction, 2010, (1): 72-83.
  • 8Lin SS,Liu EZ,Yuan S. Web - based Peer Assessment: Feedback for Students with Various Thinking - styles[J] Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2001, (4): 420-432.
  • 9Chen N,Wei C,Wu K, et al. Effects of High Level Prompts and Peer Assessment on Online Learners' Reflection Levels[J]. Computers & Education, 2009, (2): 283-291.
  • 10Yu F. Multiple Peer-assessment Modes to Augment Online Student Question-generation Processes[J]. Computers & Education, 2011, (2): 484-494.

共引文献27

同被引文献10

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部