期刊文献+

CapeOX和SOX化疗方案治疗晚期结直肠癌的疗效观察 被引量:6

Efficacy of CapeOX and SOX chemotherapy regimens in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨奥沙利铂+卡培他滨(CapeOX方案)和奥沙利铂+替吉奥(SOX方案)化疗治疗晚期结直肠癌的临床疗效。方法选取2015年1月至2017年1月间大连大学附属新华医院收治的100例晚期结直肠癌患者,采用随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组,每组50例。观察组患者采用CapeOX方案化疗,对照组患者采用SOX方案化疗,比较两组患者临床疗效、不良反应、生活质量、生存率、血清糖链抗原242(CA-242)和血清DR-70水平。结果随访3年,对照组患者脱落3例,观察组患者脱落2例。治疗6周后,观察组患者有效率为39.6%,疾病控制率为91.7%,对照组为31.9%和85.1%,两组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗后,两组患者KPS评分均上升,且观察组高于对照组,KPS稳定率(93.8%)高于对照组(63.8%),差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。治疗后,两组患者CA-242和DR-70水平均下降,且观察组下降程度大于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。治疗6周后,两组患者均发生血红蛋白减少、血小板减少、白细胞计数降低和周围神经毒性等不良反应,观察组血红蛋白减少、白细胞降低和周围神经毒性发生率均低于对照组(均P<0.05)。随访36个月,观察组患者生存时间为36个月,对照组患者为31.5个月,两组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论CapeOX化疗方案治疗晚期结直肠癌患者疗效较好,能有效降低血清CA-242和DR-70水平,安全性好。 Objective To explore and analyze the clinical efficacy of oxaliplatin plus capecitabine(CapeOX)and oxaliplatin plus tegafur(SOX)chemotherapy regimens in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.Methods One hundred patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated at Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Dalian University from January 2015 to January 2017 were selected.They were divided into an observation group and a control group with 50 patients in each group using digital table method.The observation group received CapeOX therapy and the control group received SOX therapy.The clinical efficacy,adverse reactions,quality of life,survival rate,serum carbohydrate antigen-242(CA-242)and DR-70 levels were compared between the two groups.Results The patients were followed up for 3 years,3 patients dropped out of the therapy in the observation group and 2 patients dropped out of the therapy in the control group.Response rate and disease control rate was 39.6%and 91.7,respectively in the observation group and 31.9%and 85.1%,respectively in the control group(P>0.05).Karnofsky performance status scale(KPS)score increased in both groups after the treatment with the observation group higher than the control group(P<0.05).The stable rate of KPS was 93.8%in the observation group which was higher than 63.8%of the control group(P<0.05).After treatment,the levels of CA-242 and DR-70 decreased in the two groups,and the reduction of CA-242 and DR-70 levels were lower in the observation group than in the control group(all P<0.05).At 6 weeks after the treatment,adverse reactions including reduced hemoglobin,thrombocytopenia,leukopenia and peripheral neurotoxicity occurred in the two groups.The incidence of thrombocytopenia,leukopeniaand peripheral neurotoxicity was lower in the observation group than in the control group(P<0.05).The two groups were followed-up for 36 months,the survival period was 36 months in the observation group and 31.5 months in the control group(P>0.05).Conclusion Compared with SOX chemotherapy,Cape OX chemotherapy is effective in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer,which can effectively reduce serum CA-242 and DR-2 with good safety.
作者 张福杰 于登峰 王艺 ZHANG Fu-jie;YU Deng-feng;WANG Yi(Department of Anorectal Surgery,Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Dalian University,Dalian 116022,China)
出处 《中国肿瘤临床与康复》 2021年第2期152-156,共5页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology and Rehabilitation
关键词 CapeOX方案 SOX方案 结直肠肿瘤 糖类抗原-242 血清纤维蛋白降解复合物 CapeOX chemotherapy regimen SOX chemotherapy regimen Colorectal carcinoma Carbohydrate antigen-242 Serum fibrin degradation product
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献67

  • 1杨学宁,吴一龙.实体瘤治疗疗效评价标准——RECIST[J].循证医学,2004,4(2):85-90. 被引量:1548
  • 2Llovet JM, Ricci S, Mazzaferro V, et al. SHARP Investigators study group, sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. N Engl J Med, 2008, 359(4):378-390.
  • 3Cheng AL, Kang YK, Chen Z, et al. Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients in the Asia-Pacific region with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase Ⅲ randomised, double-blind, placebocon- trolled trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2009, 10(1):25-34.
  • 4Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. New guidelines to eval- uate theresponse to treatment in solid tumors, european organiza- tion for research and treatment of cancer, national cancer institute of the united states, national cancer institute of canada[J]. J Nati Cancer Inst, 2000, 92(3):205-216.
  • 5Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evalua- tion criteriain solid tumours: Revised REClST guideline (version 1.1) [J]. Eur J Cancer, 2009, 45(2):228-227.
  • 6Bruix J, Sherman M, Llovet JM, et al. EASI. panel of experts on HCC european association for the study of the liver, clinical manage- ment ofhepatocellular carcinoma, conclusions of the barcelona- 2000 EASL conference[J]. J Hepatol, 2001, 35(3):421-430.
  • 7Riccardo L, Josep ML. Modified RECIST(mREClST) assessment for hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Semin in Liver Dis, 2010, 30(1):52-60.
  • 8YozoSato, Hirokazu Watanabe. Tumor response evaluation criteria for HCC (hepatocellular carcinoma) treated using TACE (transcathe- ter arterialchemoembolization): RECIST (response evaluation crite- ria in solid tumors)version LI and mRECIST (modified RECIST): JIV- ROSG-O602[J]. Ups J Med Sci, 2013, 118(1):16-22.
  • 9Gavanier M, Ayav A, Sellal C, et al. CT imaging findings in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib: Al- ternative response criteria (Choi, european association for the study of the liver, and modified response evaluation criteria in sol- id tumor (mREClST)) versus REClST 1.1[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2016, 85(1): 103-112.
  • 10Dawson LA, McGinn C J, Normolle D, et al. Escalated focal liver radiation and concurrent hepatic artery fluorodeoxyuridine for unresectable intrahepatic malignancies[J]. J ClinOncol, 2000, 18(11):2210-2218.

共引文献257

同被引文献74

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部