期刊文献+

COSMIN方法介绍:结合一项系统评价实例进行解读 被引量:11

Introduction of COSMIN method:interpretation of COSMIN method combined with a systematic evaluation example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 结合2019年遵循COSMIN方法制作的一篇关于情绪自评量表(DASS-21)的系统评价,对COSMIN系统评价制作方法进行解读,逐条说明并分析COSMIN系统评价制作方法的步骤与注意事项,旨在促进国内研究者与临床实践者的深入理解和正确使用。 Combined with a systematic evaluation on the self-rating emotional Scale(DASS-21)following the COSMIN method in 2019,the production method of the systematic evaluation of COSMIN was interpreted,And the steps and precautions of COSMIN systematic evaluation were explained and analyzed one by one,in order to promote the in-depth understanding and correct use of COSMIN systematic evaluation in domestic researchers and clinical practitioners.
作者 陈祎婷 彭健 沈蓝君 胡雁 余桂星 李铮 CHEN Yiting;PENG Jian;SHEN Lanjun;HU Yan;YU Guixing;LI Zheng(School of Nursing,Fudan University,Shanghai 200032 China)
出处 《护理研究》 北大核心 2021年第9期1505-1510,共6页 Chinese Nursing Research
基金 复旦大学-复星护理科研基金项目,编号:FNF201929。
关键词 COSMIN 结局 测量工具 系统评价 解读 COSMIN outcome assessment tool systematic review interpretation
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献23

  • 1Mulrow CD. The medical review article: state of the science. Ann Intern Med, 1987, 106(3): 485-488.
  • 2Cook DJ, Sackett DL, Spitzer WO. Methodologic guidelines for systematic reviews of randomized control trials in health care from the Potsdam Consultation on Meta-Analysis. J Clin Epidemiol, 1995, 48(1): 167-171.
  • 3Cook DJ, Mulrow CD, Haynes RB. Systematic reviews: synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Ann Intern Med, 1997, 126(5): 376-380.
  • 4Moher D, Soeken K, Sampson M, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of systematic reviews in pediatric complementary and alternative medicine. BMC Pediatr, 2002, 2(2): 1-3.
  • 5Jadad A, Moher M, Browman G, et al. Systematic reviews and meta analyses on treatment of asthma: critical evaluation. BMJ, 2000, 321(7256): 537-540.
  • 6Jadad AR, Cook DJ, Jones A. Methodology and reports of systematic reviews and meta-analysis: a comparison of Cochrane paper-based journals. JAMA, 1998, 280(3): 278-280.
  • 7Schlosser RW, Goetze H. Effectiveness and treatment validity of interventions addressing self-injurious behavior: From narrative reviews to meta-analyses. Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities, 1992, 7: 135-175.
  • 8Oxman AD, Guyatt GH. Validation of an index of the quality of review articles. J Clin Epidemiol, 1991, 44(11): 1271-1278.
  • 9Oxman AD, Guyatt GH, Singer J, Goldsmith CH, et al. Agreement among reviewers of review articles. J Clin Epidemiol, 1991, 44(1): 91-98.
  • 10Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, et al. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2007, 7: 10.

共引文献21

同被引文献131

引证文献11

二级引证文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部