期刊文献+

论国际商事仲裁第三方资助信息披露机制 被引量:8

Construction of Information Disclosure Mechanism of Third Party Funding in International Commercial Arbitration
原文传递
导出
摘要 第三方资助的使用,加剧了仲裁庭潜在利益冲突发现、费用担保作出等方面的困难。信息披露可作为解决手段。目前信息披露机制存在披露义务主体不明、范围不清、手段不详等问题,应构建以受资助者和仲裁员为披露义务主体,第三方资助者的存在及身份、资助者与仲裁员之间的关系为常规披露内容、资助协议条款为例外披露内容,系统性强制披露为主、个案申请决定披露为辅的信息披露机制。机制的构建,可为我国第三方资助的引入提供参考。 In international commercial arbitration,the use of Third-party Funding has exacerbated the difficulties in discovering potential conflicts of interest,making security for costs and so on.Given the rules of disclosure obligation subject is unknown,the scope is not clear,should be built to the grantees and arbitrator as the main body in the disclosure obligation,the existence of the third party funder,identity and its contents,and the relationship between the arbitrator for conventional exception disclosure content of third party funding agreement and the systemic mandatory disclosure and auxiliary,case application decided to disclose information disclosure mechanism.The construction of the mechanism can provide a reference for the introduction of third-party funding in China.
作者 张晓萍 Zhang Xiaoping
机构地区 海南大学法学院
出处 《国际经济法学刊》 2021年第2期136-147,共12页 Journal of International Economic Law
基金 2019年海南省社科重大课题“中国特色自由贸易港民商事纠纷快捷高效解决机制研究”[HNSK(ZD)19-112] 海南省法学会“中国特色自由贸易港民商事纠纷快捷高效解决机制研究”(hnfx2018a08)的阶段性研究成果。
关键词 国际商事仲裁 第三方资助 信息披露 利益冲突 International Commercial Arbitration Third Party Funding Information Disclosure Conflicts of Interest
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献63

  • 1毛志远.论国际商事仲裁程序的透明化要求[J].金陵法律评论,2011(2):149-154. 被引量:1
  • 2葛洪义.严格规则主义是法治建设的首要任务[J].政治与法律,1997(3):2-2. 被引量:8
  • 3孙祥生.论自然正义原则在当代的发展趋势[J].西南政法大学学报,2006,8(2):3-9. 被引量:6
  • 4Buys C G. The Tensions Between Confidentiality and Transparency in International Arbitration[ J]. Am. Rev. Intl Arb. , Vol. 14,2003:121.
  • 5Gruner D M. Accounting for the Public Interest in International Arbitration: The Need for Procedural and Structural Reform[J], Colum. J. Transnatl L., Vol. 41,2003:960.
  • 6R. Gerbay. Confidentiality vs Transparency in International Arbitration: The English Perspective [ J]. Trans- national Dispute Management, March 2012, [ 2014-6-3 ] , http ://ssrn. com/abstract = 2134137.
  • 7Paul Marcus & Vicki Waye. Australia and the United States: Two Common Criminal Justice Systems Uncom- monly at Odds[J]. Tul. J. Intl & Comp. L. , Vol. 12,Spring 2004:27.
  • 8Steve Charnovitz. Transparency and Participation in the World Trade Organization [ J]. Rutgers L. Rev. , Vol. 56, Summer 2004:927.
  • 9Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann. Challenges to the Legitimacy and Efficiency of the World Trading System: Demo- cratic Governance and Competition Culture in the WTO[J]. J. Intl Econ. L. , Vol. 7, 2004:585.
  • 10Mark Fenster. The Opacity of Transparency [J]. Iowa Law Review, Vol. 91, 2006,http://ssrn. com/ab- stract = 928550.

共引文献53

同被引文献52

引证文献8

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部