摘要
This paper aims to analyse new architectural works that were created within the ruins of castles and fortifications.The contribution addresses the question whether it is possible to indicate common features in these types of objects,by studying what changed and how it changed in the complexes of historic ruins by introducing a new layer:a new form in their space.The analysis covers eight complexes of castle ruins located in Europe,all being important elements of local historical heritage,all preserved in their historical forms as permanent ruins.Such places are characterised by high imageability,which is conducive to maintaining interest,despite political or ideological changes.The need to introduce new functions,which is connected with this interest,raises questions related to preserving the identity and authenticity of the place,while at the same time building relationships with modern architecture.The research concerned examples from Europe,mostly post-competition works.Research and analysis have shown that all the objects are characterised by well thought-out urban solutions and carefully selected locations of new buildings within the existing historic ruins,thereby helping maintain the structural order between the existing and the new spatial forms.Interventions within the castle ruins were carried out using modern architectural language,using modern techniques and solutions,with great attention to detail.They are characterised by the abstraction of new forms and the creative reinterpretation of existing architectural elements and material solutions of the monuments.The consciously applied contrast of forms and materials means that the historical heritage is being rediscovered,enriched with new,currently necessary functions.In all the described works,the introduction of new spatial experiences within existing objects constituted a significant value.The examples analysed show that the experience and analysis of the broadly understood historical,urban and architectural context are conducive to the creation of valuable architectural works.The characteristics of these examples may contribute to a broader debate on the dialogue between historical heritage and contemporary architecture.
